Instrument Development: Problem Solving, Independence, and Communication Skills, integrated with Bakpia Making in the Material on Quantity and Measurement

Nisya Indriyanti Irawan; Ayu Mar'ati Barokatun Ni'mah; Edi Istiyono

doi:10.30998/1r4awm79

Authors

Nisya Indriyanti Irawan Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta Author
Ayu Mar'ati Barokatun Ni'mah Author
Edi Istiyono Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.30998/1r4awm79

Keywords:

Instrument, Problem Solving, Independence, Communication Skills, Quantity and Measurement

Abstract

Assessing 21st-century skills such as problem solving, independent learning, and communication poses a significant challenge, as traditional assessments often fail to measure them holistically. This study aims to fill this gap by developing and validating a set of integrated assessment instruments—cognitive, affective, and psychomotor—contextualized with the local wisdom of bakpia making. The goal is to produce valid and reliable instruments that meet modern psychometric standards and can be applied to high school students. This study uses a quantitative development method, adapting the Wilson, Oriondo and Antonio model. The process includes three main stages: instrument design (developing a framework and items based on relevant theory), expert validation, and field testing on 10th-grade students at a public high school in Yogyakarta. The data were analyzed using the Rasch Model (Model 1-PL for cognitive; Graded Response Model for affective and psychomotor) to evaluate item fit, reliability, difficulty index, and item discrimination. The results showed that all three instruments had consistently strong psychometric properties. The cognitive instrument (problem solving) was valid, with item INFIT MNSQ values ranging from 0.80 to 1.27. This instrument was also highly reliable (Cronbach's alpha = 0.78) and had a good difficulty level distribution. The affective instrument (learning independence) was also proven to be valid (INFIT MNSQ = 0.86–1.18) and highly reliable (Cronbach's alpha = 0.90). Similarly, the psychomotor instrument (communication) is valid with an INFIT MNSQ value of 0.82–1.19 and shows exceptional reliability (Cronbach's alpha = 0.95). The positive item discrimination values on all instruments further reinforce their quality. In conclusion, this study successfully developed a valid, reliable, and contextually relevant integrated assessment instrument to measure 21st-century skills. These findings provide a practical model for educators to implement culture-based holistic assessments, which offer a comprehensive evaluation of student competencies beyond factual knowledge.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Adam, R. J., & Khoo, S. T. (1996). QUEST: The interactive test analysis system version 2.1. In Australian Council for Educational Research.

Amir, I., Nursalam, N., & Mustafa, I. (2022). Tantangan Implementasi Nilai-Nilai Profil Pelajar Pancasila dalam Pembelajaran Bahasa Indonesia pada Kurikulum Merdeka Belajar. GHANCARAN: Jurnal Pendidikan Bahasa Dan Sastra Indonesia, 204–215. https://doi.org/10.19105/ghancaran.vi.7587

Angriani, A. D., Nursalam, N., Fuadah, N., & Baharuddin, B. (2018). PENGEMBANGAN INSTRUMEN TES UNTUK MENGUKUR KEMAMPUAN PEMECAHAN MASALAH MATEMATIKA SISWA. AULADUNA: Jurnal Pendidikan Dasar Islam, 5(2). https://doi.org/10.24252/auladuna.v5i2a9.2018

Arista, F. S., & Kuswanto, H. (2018). Virtual physics laboratory application based on the android smartphone to improve learning independence and conceptual understanding. International Journal of Instruction, 11(1). https://doi.org/10.12973/iji.2018.1111a

Asiati, S., & Hasanah, U. (2022). IMPLEMENTASI PROJEK PENGUATAN PROFIL PELAJAR PANCASILA DI SEKOLAH PENGGERAK. Jurnal Lingkar Mutu Pendidikan, 19(2). https://doi.org/10.54124/jlmp.v19i2.78

Astuti, E. J., & Fitriani, R. (2021). Analisis Deskripsi Sikap Kemandirian Belajar Siswa Pada Mata Pelajaran Fisika Kelas X MIPA SMAN1 Bungo. Journal Evaluation in Education (JEE), 2(3). https://doi.org/10.37251/jee.v2i3.226

Audhiha, M., Vebrianto, R., Habibi, M., Febliza, A., & Afdal, Z. (2022). Pengembangan Instrumen Kemandirian Belajar untuk Siswa Sekolah Dasar. Madrasah: Jurnal Pendidikan Dan Pembelajaran Dasar, 14(2). https://doi.org/10.18860/mad.v14i2.13187

Baker, F. B. (2001). The Basics of Item Response Theory. Second Edition. Eric.Ed.Gov.

Bransford, J. D. + S. B. S. (1993). THE IDEAL PROBLEM SOLVER. W. H. Freeman and Company.

Crocker, L., & Algina, James. (2008). Introduction to classical and modern test theory- Procedures for Estimating Reliability. In Harcourt Brace Jovanovich College.

DeVito, J. a. (2008). The Interpersonal Communication Book. PsycCRITIQUES, 32.

Fitrianty, F., Yunita, A., & Juwita, R. (2022). Pengembangan Instrumen Tes Kemampuan Pemecahan Masalah Matematika di SMP Negeri 12 Padang. Lattice Journal : Journal of Mathematics Education and Applied, 2(1). https://doi.org/10.30983/lattice.v2i1.5337

Griffin, P. + M. B. (2012). Assessment and Teaching of 21st Century Skills (E. Care, Ed.). Springer.

Hambleton R, S. H. (1985). Item Response Theory. Principles and applications. Boston: Kluwer Nijhoff Publishing.

Heller, K., & Heller, P. (2010). Cooperative Problem Solving in Physics A User’s Manual. University of Minnesota.

Istiyono, E. (2018). PENGEMBANGAN INSTRUMEN PENILAIAN DAN ANALISIS HASIL BELAJAR FISIKA DENGAN TEORI TES KLASIK DAN MODERN. UNY Press.

Istiyono, E., Mardapi, D., & Suparno, S. (2014). PENGEMBANGAN TES KEMAMPUAN BERPIKIR TINGKAT TINGGI FISIKA (PysTHOTS) PESERTA DIDIK SMA. Jurnal Penelitian Dan Evaluasi Pendidikan, 18(1). https://doi.org/10.21831/pep.v18i1.2120

Keeves, J. P., & Masters, G. N. (1999). Advances in Measurement in Educational Research and Assessment. In Introduction.

Knowles, M. (1975). self-directed learning. Follett Publishing Company.

Kurniawan, B. R., Reyza, M., Taqwa, A., & Fisika, P. (2018). Pengembangan Instrumen Tes Kemampuan Pemecahan Masalah Fisika pada Materi Listrik Dinamis. Jurnal Pendidikan, 3(1).

Leask, M., & Pachler, N. (2014). LEARNING TO TEACH USING ICT IN THE SECONDARY SCHOOL. Routledge. http://www.bodleian.ox.ac.uk/education

Lesmana, C., & Nurussaniah, N. (2022). Integrasi Kearifan Lokal Kalimantan Barat dan ICT Berbasis Anroid dalam Media Pembelajaran Fisika. Jurnal Basicedu, 6(2). https://doi.org/10.31004/basicedu.v6i2.2347

Mery, M., Martono, M., Halidjah, S., & Hartoyo, A. (2022). Sinergi Peserta Didik dalam Proyek Penguatan Profil Pelajar Pancasila. Jurnal Basicedu, 6(5). https://doi.org/10.31004/basicedu.v6i5.3617

Nisa, W. M., & Wilujeng, I. (2020). Teaching Science Books Based on Bakpia Local-Potential to Improve Students’ Critical Thinking and Communication Skills. Jurnal Penelitian Dan Pembelajaran IPA, 6(2). https://doi.org/10.30870/jppi.v6i2.8716

Nisa, W. M., & Wilujeng, I. (2021). Development of integrated science textbooks on local potential food Bakpia for junior high school. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1806(1). https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1806/1/012126

Nugroho, A. S., & Mawardi, M. (2021). Pengembangan Instrumen Penilaian Sikap Tanggungjawab dalam Pembelajaran Tematik di Sekolah Dasar. Jurnal Basicedu, 5(2). https://doi.org/10.31004/basicedu.v5i2.825

Nurhikmayati, I., & Sunendar, A. (2020). Pengembangan Project Based Learning Berbasis Kearifan Lokal Berorientasi pada Kemampuan Berpikir Kreatif dan Kemandirian Belajar. Mosharafa: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 9(1). https://doi.org/10.31980/mosharafa.v9i1.604

Oktaviani, F., & Hidayat, T. (2015). PROFIL KETERAMPILAN BERKOMUNIKASI SISWA SMA MENGGUNAKAN METODE FENETIK DALAM PEMBELAJARAN KLASIFIKASI ARTHROPODA. Jurnal Pengajaran Matematika Dan Ilmu Pengetahuan Alam, 15(1). https://doi.org/10.18269/jpmipa.v15i1.288

Partnership for 21st Century Skills. (2019). Framework for 21st Century Learning. Battelle For Kids.

Permata, V. W., Sahputra, R., Erlina*, E., Sartika, R. P., & Rasmawan, R. (2022). Hubungan Antara Kemandirian Belajar dengan Hasil Belajar Kimia Kelas X MIPA di SMA Negeri 6 Pontianak. Jurnal IPA & Pembelajaran IPA, 6(4). https://doi.org/10.24815/jipi.v6i4.27418

Polya, G. (2004). How to Solve It. Princeton University Press.

Pólya, G. (2021). How to Solve It: ANew Aspect of Mathematical Method. In A Century in Books: Princeton University Press 1905–2005. https://doi.org/10.2307/2306109

Prabawanto, S. (2019). PENGEMBANGAN INSTRUMEN TES KEMAMPUAN PEMECAHAN MASALAH MATEMATIS SISWA. Jurnal Pedagogik Pendidikan Dasar, 6(1). https://doi.org/10.17509/jppd.v6i1.21521

Realitawati, R. + I. F. D. + H. E. + K. D. (2024). PENERAPAN 4C SKILLS DALAM PEMBELAJARAN ABAD 21 DI SEKOLAH DASAR. JURNAL MADRASAH IBTIDAIYAH.

Rifa Hanifa Mardhiyah, Sekar Nurul Fajriyah Aldriani, Febyana Chitta, & Muhamad Rizal Zulfikar. (2021). Pentingnya Keterampilan Belajar di Abad 21 sebagai Tuntutan dalam Pengembangan Sumber Daya Manusia. Lectura : Jurnal Pendidikan, 12(1). https://doi.org/10.31849/lectura.v12i1.5813

Rusnaini, R., Raharjo, R., Suryaningsih, A., & Noventari, W. (2021). Intensifikasi Profil Pelajar Pancasila dan Implikasinya Terhadap Ketahanan Pribadi Siswa. Jurnal Ketahanan Nasional, 27(2). https://doi.org/10.22146/jkn.67613

Sae, F. S., Husin, V. E. R., & Mellu, R. N. K. (2021). Pengembangan Bahan Ajar Fisika Berbasis Kearifan Lokal Anyaman Nyiru untuk Meningkatkan Pemahaman Konsep Siswa. Variabel, 4(1). https://doi.org/10.26737/var.v4i1.2321

Schunk, D. H., & Zimmerman, B. J. (2013). SELF REGULATION AND LEARING. In HANDBOOK OF PSYCHOLOGY VOLUME 7: EDUCATIONAL PSYCHOLOGY. John Willey & Sons.

Septiani, A. (2022). Implementasi kurikulum merdeka ditinjau dari pembelajaran matematika dan pelaksanaan P5 (studi di SMA Negeri 12 Kabupaten Tangerang). AKSIOMA : Jurnal Matematika Dan Pendidikan Matematika, 13(3). https://doi.org/10.26877/aks.v13i3.14211

Sukmadana, I. W. A. N. W. (2024). Pembelajaran Berdiferensiasi Sebagai Upaya Menguatkan Profil Pelajar. Prosiding Seminar Nasional Ilmu Pendidikan, 1. https://doi.org/10.62951/prosemnasipi.v1i1.17

Sumaryanta. (2021). TEORI TES KLASIK DAN TEORI RESPON BUTIR. CV. Confident (Anggota IKAPI Jabar).

Unik Hanifah Salsabila, Risqie Pramudya Endi, Roisul Ma’ruf, Sulaiman Saputra, & Inan Taat Diyanah. (2020). URGENSI TEKNOLOGI PENDIDIKAN DI ERA DISRUPSI. Ed-Humanistics : Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan, 5(2). https://doi.org/10.33752/ed-humanistics.v5i2.1074

Wood, J. T. (2008). Communication In Our Lives Fifth Edition. In Wadsworth Cengage Learning.

You, J. W., & Kang, M. (2014). The role of academic emotions in the relationship between perceived academic control and self-regulated learning in online learning. Computers and Education, 77. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2014.04.018