Modeling and Optimization of Teacher Innovativeness in Mathematics Instruction: A Study on Permanent Teachers at Private Vocational School Foundations in West Jakarta Using the POP SDM Method
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.30998/wat4rt12Keywords:
Teacher Innovativeness, Mathematics Instruction, Digital Literacy, POP SDM Method, Vocational School Teachers, Perceived Organizational Support (POS), PLSSEM Analysis, Pedagogical InnovationAbstract
This study aims to model and enhance the innovative capabilities of permanent mathematics teachers within private vocational schools under foundations in West Jakarta. Data was collected from 186 educators and analyzed using Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS SEM), with the POP SDM method applied for diagnostic optimization. The findings reveal that digital literacy is te strongest predictor, with a significant and substantial direct impact on teacher innovativeness (β = 0.965, p < 0.002). Transformational leadership also has a positive influence, although it is not as strong (β = 0.088, p < 0.05). An important finding from the analysis is the mediating role of Perceived Organizational Support (POS), which greatly amplifies the impact of both digital literacy (indirect effect = 0.178) and transformational leadership (indirect effect = 1.527). On the other hand, organizational culture does not have a significant direct effect (β = 0.011, p > 0.05). Through the POP SDM diagnostic, technology access and specialized training were identified as the primary catalysts for innovation in math instruction. These findings align with the Resource Based View theory, affirming digital competence as a vital strategic resource. The study culminates in a proposed optimization model advocating for a three pronged strategy: (1) implementing tailored technology training programs for mathematics teachers, (2) enhancing transformational leadership competencies among school leaders, and (3) strengthening organizational support systems with a focus on digital literacy. This research emphasized the need for a multifaceted approach is essential to advancing pedagogical innovation in vocational mathematics education, with technological empowerment and leadership development as key drivers for meaningful change.
Downloads
References
Brown, M. G., & Green, T. D. (2022). The role of transformational leadership in fostering teacher innovation. Educational Leadership Review, 23(1), 4562. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15430421tip4104_2
Davis, K., & Singh, S. (2021). Digital literacy in teacher education: A systematic review. Journal of Digital Learning in Teacher Education, 37(3), 123145. https://doi.org/10.1080/21532974.2021.1912310
Howard, S. K., Tondeur, J., Siddiq, F., & Scherer, R. (2021). Ready, set, go! Profiling teachers' readiness for online teaching in secondary education. Technology, Pedagogy and Education, 30(2), 141158. https://doi.org/10.1080/1475939X.2020.1839543
Huang, R., & Jiang, L. (2023). Digital leadership in vocational education: A systematic review. Journal of Vocational Education Research, 12(3), 4567. https://doi.org/10.1108/JVER0520230012
Jakarta Provincial Education Office. (2023). Annual Report on Teacher Competency and Educational Infrastructure in Private SMKs. Jakarta: Jakarta Provincial Education Office.
Li, H., Wang, X., & Chen, Y. (2022). Organizational support and digital literacy as predictors of teacher innovativeness in vocational education. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 25(4), 112125. https://doi.org/10.30123/jets.25.4.112
Li, H., Wang, X., & Chen, Y. (2023). Organizational support and digital literacy as predictors of teacher innovativeness in vocational education. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 26(4), 112125. https://doi.org/10.30123/jets.26.4.112
Liu, X., Wang, Y., & Zhang, Q. (2023). Innovation in private vocational schools: Challenges and strategies in developing economies. International Journal of Educational Development, 98, 102756. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijedudev.2023.102756
Scherer, R., Siddiq, F., & Tondeur, J. (2021). The technology acceptance model (TAM): A metaanalytic structural equation modeling approach. Computers & Education, 168, 104203. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2021.104203
UNESCO. (2022). Global education monitoring report 2022: Technology in education. Paris: UNESCO Publishing. https://doi.org/10.54676/UXDF8525
Veloo, A., Krishnasamy, H. N., & Wan Abdullah, W. S. (2015). Types of student errors in mathematical symbols, graphs and problemsolving. Asian Social Science, 11(15), 324–334. https://doi.org/10.5539/ass.v11n15p324
Voigt, P., Schlicht, J., & Niehaves, B. (2023). Technology integration in vocational teaching: Barriers and enablers. Journal of Vocational Education & Training, 75(3), 445463. https://doi.org/10.1080/13636820.2023.2178482
Wilson, M. L., & Chen, D. (2023). Organizational culture and innovation in educational institutions. Journal of Educational Administration, 61(2), 178195. https://doi.org/10.1108/JEA0320220045
World Bank. (2021). The Education Sector Strategy for the Digital Age. Washington, DC: World Bank Publications.
Zhang, Y., Li, H., & Chen, X. (2023). Bridging the gap: Organizational support systems for teacher innovation in vocational schools. Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 51(2), 345362. https://doi.org/10.1177/17411432211027335
Zhang, Y., Li, H., & Chen, X. (2023). Organizational support for teacher innovation: Evidence from vocational schools. Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 51(2), 345362. https://doi.org/10.1177/17411432211027335
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 M Ardiansyah, Soewarto Hardhienata, Suhendra (Author)

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.




