Implementasi Bimbingan Belajar untuk Meningkatkan Kesiapan Olimpiade Siswa
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.30998/18zq3z49Keywords:
olimpiade kimia, pendampingan, kesiapan kompetisiAbstract
Adanya kesenjangan antara kurikulum sekolah dan silabus olimpiade menyebabkan siswa SMA Muhammadiyah 2 Pontianak kesulitan berkompetisi. Kegiatan pengabdian ini bertujuan untuk meningkatkan kesiapan siswa melalui program bimbingan intensif. Siswa dibimbing selama 12 pertemuan untuk memahami konsep-konsep dasar dan lanjut disertai latihan soal secara terstruktur. Proses pembimbingan didukung dengan pemberdayaan tutor sebaya dan Buku Bimbingan Olimpiade Kimia Tingkat SMA. Kegiatan dievaluasi melalui analisis pre-test dan post-test serta observasi selama pembimbingan berlangsung. Hasil analisis menunjukkan siswa memiliki kesiapan mengikuti kompetisi yang lebih baik dengan N-Gain pre-test dan post-test sebesar 0,35. Observasi menunjukkan siswa dapat menganalisis soal khas oimpiade, khususnya pada materi Stoikiometri dan Struktur Atom. Selain itu, pengabdian ini menghasilkan luaran berupa modul ajar mandiri yang dihibahkan kepada sekolah untuk menjamin keberlanjutan pembinaan di masa mendatang.
Downloads
References
da Silva, R. C., & Bizerra, A. M. C. (2020). Investigative experimentation as a teaching practice in Chemistry from an Ausubelian and Vygotskynian perspective. Research, Society and Development, 9(4), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.33448/rsd-v9i4.2980
Ericsson, K. A. (2020). Towards a science of the acquisition of expert performance in sports: Clarifying the differences between deliberate practice and other types of practice. Journal of Sports Sciences, 38(2), 159–176. https://doi.org/10.1080/02640414.2019.1688618
Fowles, J. (2014). Funding and Focus: Resource Dependence in Public Higher Education. Research in Higher Education, 55(3), 272–287. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11162-013-9311-x
Hofstein, A., & Lunetta, V. N. (2004). The laboratory in science education: Foundations for the twenty-first century. Science Education, 88(1), 28–54. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.10106
Khotimah, H., Sa’dijah, C., Rofiki, I., & Latifah, E. R. A. (2024). Proses Berpikir Siswa dalam Menyelesaikan Masalah Bilangan Berpangkat dan Bentuk Akar Berdasarkan Teori Pemrosesan Informasi. Mathedunesa, 13(2), 499–513. https://doi.org/10.26740/mathedunesa.v13n2.p499-513
Krige, J., & Wang, J. (2015). Nation, Knowledge, and Imagined Futures: Science, Technology, and Nation-Building, Post-1945. History and Technology, 31(3), 171–179. https://doi.org/10.1080/07341512.2015.1126022
Kurniati, R., Arsalan, O., Primanita, A., Fachrurrozi, M., Satria, H., & Rizqie, M. Q. (2025). Pemahaman Critical Thinking Dalam Menghadapi Olimpiade Sains Nasional (OSN) Untuk Guru SMA Al-Kautsar Bandar Lampung. Jurnal Abdimas Maduma, 4(2), 19–23. https://doi.org/10.52622/jam.v4i2.434
Miller, S. D., Chow, D., Wampold, B. E., Hubble, M. A., Del Re, A. C., Maeschalck, C., & Bargmann, S. (2020). To be or not to be (an expert)? Revisiting the role of deliberate practice in improving performance. High Ability Studies, 31(1), 5–15. https://doi.org/10.1080/13598139.2018.1519410
Naqsyahbandi, F., Mulyatun, M., Drastisianti, A., & Muhariyansah, J. (2022). Analysis of The Use of Analogy of Chemical Education Students on The Concept of Chemical Bond. J-PEK (Jurnal Pembelajaran Kimia), 7(2), 58–72. https://doi.org/10.17977/um026v7i22022p058
Obet, Z., Sumiyati, S., Azzahra, S. F., & Harefa, N. (2023). Peningkatan Hasil Belajar Kimia Siswa Melalui Metode Tutor Sebaya pada Materi Sistem Periodik Unsur. Jurnal Pendidikan Kimia Universitas Riau, 8(2), 147–153. http://dx.doi.org/10.33578/jpk-unri.v8i2.7863
Overby, J. (2025). Chemistry (Fifteenth edition). McGraw Hill.
Permatasari, M. B., Rahayu, S., & Dasna, I. W. (2022). Chemistry Learning Using Multiple Representations: A Systematic Literature Review. Journal of Science Learning, 5(2), Article 2. https://doi.org/10.17509/jsl.v5i2.42656
Puspresnas. (2024). Pedoman Olimpiade Sains Nasional (OSN) SMA/MA/Sederajat 2024. Balai Pengembangan Talnta Indonesia, Pusat Prestasi Nasional, Kemendikbudristek.
Siyepu, S. (2013). The zone of proximal development in the learning of mathematics. South African Journal of Education, 33(2), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.15700/saje.v33n2a714
Sugiyono. (2013). Metode penelitian pendidikan pendekatan kuantitatif, kualitatif dan R&D. Alfabeta.
Sweller, J. (2011). Cognitive Load Theory. Psychology of Learning and Motivation, 55(2), 37–76. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-387691-1.00002-8
Vo, K., Sarkar, M., White, P. J., & Yuriev, E. (2025). Exploring Problem-Solving Scaffolds in General Chemistry: A Systematic Review of Scaffolding Goals and Instructional Approaches. Journal of Chemical Education, 102(3), 1004–1018. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jchemed.4c01327
Zuber-Skerritt, O. (2018). An educational framework for participatory action learning and action research (PALAR). Educational Action Research, 26(4), 513–532. https://doi.org/10.1080/09650792.2018.1464939
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Rizmahardian Ashari Kurniawan, Seritami (Author)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
