Konstruksi Pemahaman Berpikir Logis Kreatif dan Komputasional melalui Aktivitas Kontekstual
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.30998/jurnalpkm.v9i3.2476Keywords:
aktivitas kontekstual, berpikir komputasional, berpikir kreatif, berpikir logis, model konseptual, pengembangan profesional guruAbstract
Berpikir komputasional merupakan kompetensi esensial abad ke-21, namun dalam praktik pembelajaran masih sering dipersepsikan sebagai keterampilan teknis berbasis teknologi. Kegiatan pengabdian ini bertujuan mengonstruksi pemahaman guru tentang berpikir komputasional sebagai cara berpikir yang berakar pada berpikir logis dan kreatif melalui aktivitas kontekstual non-digital, sebagai bagian dari pengembangan profesional guru. Kegiatan dilaksanakan pada 15 Agustus 2025 di wilayah Rancabali, Bandung Selatan dan diikuti oleh 10 guru, melalui workshop partisipatif, praktik perancangan pembelajaran, observasi keterlibatan peserta, serta penilaian produk desain pembelajaran. Data dianalisis secara deskriptif untuk mengidentifikasi perkembangan pemahaman peserta. Hasil menunjukkan pergeseran perspektif dari orientasi teknologi menuju pemahaman berpikir komputasional sebagai proses kognitif sistematis dalam pemecahan masalah, dengan 80% peserta menunjukkan peningkatan pada keterlibatan aktif dalam diskusi dan presentasi solusi. Luaran utama berupa model konseptual integrasi berpikir komputasional berbasis aktivitas kontekstual yang menyediakan kerangka implementatif bagi guru. Evaluasi persepsi peserta menunjukkan respons sangat positif, dengan skor kepuasan rata-rata 4.8 dari skala 5.
Downloads
References
Adnan, N., Abdullah, S. N. H. S., Raja Yusof, R. J., Zainal, N. F. A., Qamar, F., & Yadegaridehkordi, E. (2023). A Systematic Literature Review in Robotics Experiential Learning With Computational and Adversarial Thinking. IEEE Access, 11(February), 44806–44827. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2023.3249761
Arega, N. T., & Hunde, T. S. (2025). Constructivist instructional approaches: A systematic review of evaluation-based evidence for effectiveness. Review of Education, 13(1), e70040. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/rev3.70040
Barbot, B., & Kaufman, J. C. (2025). PISA 2022 Creative Thinking Assessment: Opportunities, Challenges, and Cautions. The Journal of Creative Behavior, 59(1), e70003. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/jocb.70003
Cletus Lamatokan, S., Suryani, L., Yuanawati, N., & Paud, M. (2026). Pelatihan Kompetensi Guru Paud Merancang Modul Ajar Deep Learning Profil Lulusan AUD. Jurnal PkM, 09(01), 2026–2048.
Creswell, J. W., & Poth, C. N. (2016). Qualitative Inquiry & Research Design: Choosing among Five Approaches. SAGE Publications.
Ezeamuzie, N. O., & Leung, J. S. C. (2022). Computational Thinking Through an Empirical Lens: A Systematic Review of Literature. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 60(2), 481–511. https://doi.org/10.1177/07356331211033158
Fuchs, H., Benkova, E., Fishbein, A., & Fuchs, A. (2024). The Importance of Psychological and Cognitive Flexibility in Educational Processes to Prepare and Acquire the Skills Required in the Twenty-First Century. In Corporate Practices: Policies, Methodologies, and Insights in Organizational Management: Vol. June (None, pp. 91–114). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-97-0996-0_6
Ganira, K. L., & Odundo, P. A. (2023). Experiential Learning Style Models on Implementation of Pre-Primary School Social Studies Curriculum: Systematic Review of Related Literature. Asian Journal of Education and Social Studies, 42(1), 9–20. https://doi.org/10.9734/ajess/2023/v42i1905
Ismail, R., Steinbach, T. A., & Miller, C. S. (2022). A Guide Towards a Definition of Computational Thinking in K-12. 2022 IEEE Global Engineering Education Conference (EDUCON), 801–810. https://doi.org/10.1109/EDUCON52537.2022.9766703
Junaeti, E., Pramitha Muslim, A., Ate, D., Khaedir Lutfi, M., Sukjaya Kusumah, Y., & Herman, T. (2023). Strategi Peningkatan Kompetensi Pedagogik: Pelatihan Computational Thinking bagi Calon Guru Matematika. INCOME: Indonesian Journal of Community Service and Engagement, 2(4), 326–336. https://doi.org/10.56855/income.v2i4.833
Lehmann, T. H. (2024). How current perspectives on algorithmic thinking can be applied to students’ engagement in algorithmatizing tasks. Mathematics Education Research Journal, 36(3), 609–643. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13394-023-00462-0
Mardianto, N. F. D., & Yahfizham, Y. (2024). Systematic Literature Review: Penerapan Berpikir Komputasi Dalam Pembelajaran Matematika. Journal of Student Research, 2(4), 41–55. https://doi.org/10.55606/jsr.v2i4.3082
Marethi. (2024). Tinjauan Literatur Sistematis Tentang Berpikir Komputasional Dalam Pendidikan Matematika : Jurnal Untirta, 5(4), 354. https://jurnal.untirta.ac.id/index.php/wilangan/article/view/30075%0Ahttps://jurnal.untirta.ac.id/index.php/wilangan/article/viewFile/30075/13912
Mirolo, C., Izu, C., Lonati, V., & Scapin, E. (2021). Abstraction in Computer Science Education: An Overview. Informatics in Education, 20(4), 615–639. https://doi.org/10.15388/INFEDU.2021.27
Qudrat-Ullah, H. (2024). Review of Literature and Models on Creativity and Decision Making BT - Creativity Loops–Based Decision Making: A Systems Thinking Approach (H. Qudrat-Ullah (ed.); pp. 9–29). Springer Nature Switzerland. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-70270-9_2
Rahma P, F. L., Putri, I. A., & Tanjung, M. S. (2024). Studi Literatur : Pentingnya Berpikir Komputasional dalam Meningkatkan Kemampuan Pemecahan Masalah Matematis Peserta Didik yang sangat penting untuk dikuasai . pertama kali dipopulerkan oleh Jeannete Wing , seorang ahli komputer dari Carnegie Mellon denga. Bilangan : Jurnal Ilmiah Matematika, Kebumian Dan Angkasa, 2(2), 17–27.
Rasim, Ali Nurdin, E., Junaeti, E., Sopianti, Y., & Aridia Alfitri, L. (2025). Pemberdayaan Guru dalam Mengintegrasikan Educational Data Analytics sebagai Upaya Optimalisasi Proses Pembelajaran di Era Digital. Jurnal Atma Inovasia, 5(5), 392–396.
Raviv, L., Lupyan, G., & Green, S. C. (2022). How variability shapes learning and generalization. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 26(6), 462–483. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2022.03.007
Shute, V. J., Sun, C., & Asbell-Clarke, J. (2017). Demystifying computational thinking. Educational Research Review, 22, 142–158. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2017.09.003
Szilágyi, S., Körei, A., & Vaičiulytė, I. (2025). The Role of Non-Digital and Digital UNO-Type Card Games as Learning Media in Different Levels of Mathematics Education: A Systematic Review. Education Sciences, 15(8). https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci15081030
Utomo, Y. B., Yuliana, D. E., Sampurna, W. F., & Putri, S. R. (2026). Peningkatan Kompetensi Guru melalui Pelatihan Pengelolaan Kelas Online Berbasis Google Classroom. Jurnal PkM Pengabdian Kepada Masyarakat, 9(2), 625–634.
Yeni, S., Grgurina, N., Saeli, M., Hermans, F., Tolboom, J., & Barendsen, E. (2024). Interdisciplinary Integration of Computational Thinking in K-12 Education: A Systematic Review. Informatics in Education, 23(1), 223–278. https://doi.org/10.15388/infedu.2024.08
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Enjun Junaeti, Herbert Siregar, Latifahny Aridia Alfitri, Yuli Sopianti (Author)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
