Optimalisasi Self-Efficacy dan Pemanfaatan Artificial Intelligence dalam Pembelajaran Bahasa Inggris di SLB
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.30998/jurnalpkm.v9i3.4383Keywords:
Self-Efficacy, Artificial Intelligence, Participatory Action Research, Pendidikan Luar BiasaAbstract
Pembelajaran bahasa Inggris bagi para guru inklusi masih menjadi tantangan karena membutuhkan strategi berbeda yang harus menyesuaikan dengan perkembangan tiap peserta didik berkebutuhan khusus. Hal ini kerap memunculkan kurangnya efikasi diri guru dalam implementasinya. Selain itu, dalam menghadapi era digital saat ini, para guru dituntut untuk mengikuti alur perkembangannya agar peserta didik dapat mengenal penerapan teknologi yang relevan. Lainnya, kemunculan Artificial Intelligence (AI) sudah merambah dengan pesat di bidang pendidikan, dan hal ini dapat diintegrasikan di seluruh bidang, termasuk dalam pendidikan inklusi. Oleh karena itu, kegiatan PkM ini bertujuan untuk memberikan pelatihan terkait optimalisasi strategi self-efficacy dan pemanfaatan AI dalam pembelajaran bahasa Inggris untuk para guru di SLB Mahardika Depok. Metode PkM yang diterapkan adalah pendekatan Participatory Action Research (PAR) dengan detail tahapan pelaksanaan berupa perencanaan, tindakan, observasi, dan refleksi. Hasil kegiatan menunjukkan persepsi guru akan peningkatan efikasi diri yang ditandai dengan motivasi peserta PkM sebagai upaya untuk melaksanakan pembelajaran bahasa Inggris dengan menggunakan media AI, khususnya dalam pendidikan luar biasa.
Downloads
References
Alagözlü, N. (2016). Pre-service EFL teachers’ professional self-concept: English teaching efficacy, self reported English proficiencey and pedagogical strategies: A case study in Turkish context. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 232(April), 196–200. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2016.10.045
Ali Saad Al- Yaari, S. (2013). Using audio-visual aids and Computer-Assisted Language Instruction (CALI) to overcome learning difficulties of reading in students of special needs. Journal for the Study of English Linguistics, 1(2), 168. https://doi.org/10.5296/jsel.v1i2.4741
Azka, S. N., Saputra, R. A., Agustina, I. W., Aristy, D., & Amanatillah, A. (2025). Teacher ’ s roles in teaching English to students with special needs : Strategies , challenges , and impacts. STAIRS: English Language Education Journal, 6(1), 22–32. https://doi.org/10.21009/stairs.6.1.3
Badilla-Quintana, M. G., Sepulveda-Valenzuela, E., & Arias, M. S. (2020). Augmented reality as a sustainable technology to improve academic achievement in students with and without special educational needs. Sustainability (Switzerland), 12(19). https://doi.org/10.3390/su12198116
Corbin, T., Tai, J., & Flenady, G. (2025). Understanding the place and value of GenAI feedback: a recognition-based framework. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 0(0), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2025.2459641
Fithriani, R. (2021). The utilization of mobile-assisted gamification for vocabulary learning: Its efficacy and perceived benefits. Call-Ej, 22(3), 146–163.
Gallud, J. A., Carreño, M., Tesoriero, R., Sandoval, A., Lozano, M. D., Durán, I., Penichet, V. M. R., & Cosio, R. (2023). Technology-enhanced and game based learning for children with special needs: a systematic mapping study. Universal Access in the Information Society, 22(1), 227–240. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10209-021-00824-0
Grgic, M. (2023). Competencies and beliefs of Swiss teachers with regard to the modular curriculum ‘Media and ICT.’ International Journal of Educational Research Open, 5(March), 100288. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijedro.2023.100288
Hawkins, B., Taylor-Griffiths, D., & Lodge, J. M. (2025). Summarise, elaborate, try again: exploring the effect of feedback literacy on AI-enhanced essay writing. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 0(0), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2025.2492070
Hopcan, S., Polat, E., Ozturk, M. E., & Ozturk, L. (2022). Artificial intelligence in special education: a systematic review. Interactive Learning Environments, May, 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2022.2067186
Huang, J., & Mizumoto, A. (2024). Examining the effect of generative AI on students’ motivation and writing self-efficacy. Digital Applied Linguistics, 102324, 1–20. https://doi.org/10.29140/dal.v1.102324
Kemmis, S., McTaggart, R., & Nixon, R. (2014). The action research planner: Doing critical participatory action research. Springer.
Kim, M. S. (2017). Multimodal modeling activities with special needs students in an informal learning context: Vygotsky revisited. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 13(6), 2133–2154. https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2017.01218a
Kim, N. J., & Kim, M. K. (2022). Teacher’s perceptions of using an artificial intelligence-based educational tool for scientific writing. Frontiers in Education, 7(755914), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2022.755914
Köse, H., & Güner-Yildiz, N. (2021). Augmented reality (AR) as a learning material in special needs education. Education and Information Technologies, 26(2), 1921–1936. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-020-10326-w
Marín-lópez, J. R. I. (2024). Is artificial intelligence use related to self-control, self- esteem and self-efficacy among university students? Education and Information Technologies, 2507–2524. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-024-12906-6
Mcintyre, A. (2008). Participatory Action Research. Sage Publication.
Park, M., & Son, J. B. (2022). Pre-service EFL teachers’ readiness in computer-assisted language learning and teaching. Asia Pacific Journal of Education, 42(2), 320–334. https://doi.org/10.1080/02188791.2020.1815649
Pellas, N. (2023). The effects of generative AI platforms on undergraduates’ narrative intelligence and writing self-efficacy. Education Sciences, 13(11). https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci13111155
Permendikbudristek. (2024). Peraturan menteri pendidikan, kebudayaan, riset, dan teknologi republik Indonesia.
Permendikdasmen. (2025). Peraturan menteri pendidikan dasar dan menengah republik Indonesia.
Shen, X., & Tao, Y. (2025). Metacognitive strategies, AI-based writing self-efficacy and writing anxiety in AI-assisted writing contexts: A structural equation modeling analysis. International Journal of TESOL Studies, 7(1), 70–87. https://doi.org/10.58304/ijts.20250105
Ting, K. Y. (2014). Multimodal resources to facilitate language learning for students with special needs. International Education Studies, 7(8), 85–93. https://doi.org/10.5539/ies.v7n8p85
Washington, J. (2023). The impact of generative artificial intelligence on writer’s self-efficacy: A critical literature review. SSRN Electronic Journal. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4538043
Wright, D. E. (2015). Active learning: Social justice education and participatory action research. In Active Learning: Social Justice Education and Participatory Action Research. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315743141
Wyatt, M., & Dikilitaş, K. (2021). English language teachers’ self-efficacy beliefs for grammar instruction: implications for teacher educators. Language Learning Journal, 49(5), 541–553. https://doi.org/10.1080/09571736.2019.1642943
Zheng, C., Liang, J. C., & Tsai, C. C. (2017). Validating an instrument for EFL learners’ sources of self-efficacy, academic self-efficacy and the relation to English proficiency. Asia-Pacific Education Researcher, 26(6), 329–340. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40299-017-0352-3
Zimmerman, B. J. (2000). Attaining self-regulation: A social cognitive perspective. In In M. Boekaerts, P. R. Pintrich, & M. Zeidner (Eds.), handbook of self-Regulation (In M. Boek, pp. 13–39). Cambridge MA Academic press.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Rina Husnaini Febriyanti, Hanna Sundari, Widya Widya (Author)

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.






