PLURALISME PARADIGMA EKONOMI DALAM PEMBELAJARAN: SYSTEMATIC LITERATURE REVIEW

Authors

  • Nadia Rista Universitas Panca Sakti Bekasi , Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia Author
  • Disman Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia Author
  • Dadang Dahlan Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia Author
  • Edi Suryadi Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia Author
  • Rasto Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.30998/4cersj43

Keywords:

Pluralisme Paradigma, Pembelajaran Ekonomi, Pedagogy Agonistik, Pendidikan Ekonomi, Systematic Literature Review

Abstract

Pendidikan ekonomi secara tradisional didominasi oleh paradigma neoklasik yang menekankan efisiensi pasar, rasionalitas individual, dan keseimbangan ekonomi. Dominasi paradigma tunggal ini dinilai kurang memadai dalam menjelaskan kompleksitas fenomena ekonomi kontemporer, seperti ketimpangan sosial, krisis lingkungan, dan dinamika ekonomi global. Seiring dengan itu, literatur pendidikan ekonomi dan pendidikan umum menekankan pentingnya pluralisme pedagogis sebagai pendekatan pembelajaran yang menyajikan beragam perspektif teoretis dan metodologis guna memperkuat pemikiran kritis peserta didik. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk meninjau secara sistematis literatur terkait pluralisme dalam pendidikan ekonomi serta mengkaji peran pedagogi kritis dan agonistic pedagogy dalam mendukung pembelajaran ekonomi yang demokratis dan reflektif. Metode yang digunakan adalah tinjauan pustaka sistematis terhadap artikel-artikel ilmiah yang membahas pluralisme ekonomi, pengembangan kurikulum heterodoks, serta peran pendidik sebagai fasilitator dialog dan konflik ide. Hasil kajian menunjukkan bahwa penerapan pluralisme pedagogis, melalui strategi seperti debat, pendekatan interdisipliner, dan pedagogi kritis, berkontribusi pada peningkatan pemahaman konseptual, kesadaran sosial, serta kapasitas peserta didik dalam menghadapi kompleksitas ekonomi nyata. Temuan ini menegaskan pentingnya transformasi pendidikan ekonomi menuju pendekatan yang lebih inklusif, demokratis, dan berorientasi pada pembentukan warga negara kritis.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Annamalah, S., Foroughi, A., Wong, C. H., Aravindan, K. L., & Ahmed, S. (2025). Advancing Economics Education: Embracing Pluralism and Critical Realism. Journal of Sustainability Research, 7(3). https://doi.org/10.20900/jsr20250049

Delgado, S. (2022). Students struggle towards curriculum change in Economics Education. Annals of Social Studies Education Research for Teachers, 3(1), 22-30. https://doi.org/10.29173/assert40

Dhondt, G. L. (2017). Developing Heterodox Economics Curriculum. American Review of Political Economy, 11(2). https://doi.org/10.38024/arpe.139

Fridrich, C. (2025). Critical or Conformist Economic Education? Reflexivity Versus Functionality in the Conflict of Interests. Critical Education, 16(2), 94-112. https://doi.org/10.14288/ce.v16i2.187006

He, Z. (2024). Implementing pluralism through active pedagogical strategies and its impact on student understanding and social relevance. Journal of Educational Practice and Innovation, 12(3), 45–59.

He, Z. (2025). Debate as a Pedagogical Tool for Pluralist Economics Education. Review of Radical Political Economics, 57(3), 429-436. https://doi.org/10.1177/04866134241268407

Ivanauskienė, G. M. (2025). Educators as gatekeepers of pluralism: Traces of agonistic pedagogy in Lithuanian democratic citizenship education. Journal of Social Science Education, 24(3). https://doi.org/10.11576/jsse-7683 ERIC

Khawaja, S., Andleeb, N., Raza, S. H., Yousaf, M., Mahmood, N., Mahmood, T., & Emenyeonu, C. O. (2025). Teaching Pedagogies for Students' Sustainable Development in Universities: The Underlying Mechanism of Cross-Cultural Communication. Educational Process: International Journal, 16, e2025221. https://doi.org/10.22521/edupij.2025.16.221

Khawaja, N., Malik, R., & Hassan, S. (2025). Unrealistic institutional expectations of sustainable pedagogy and their implications for students’ education and career prospects. Journal of Higher Education Policy and Sustainability, 9(2), 101–115.

Kisige, A., Ezati, B. A., & Kagoda, A. M. (2021). Teacher Preparation by Universities: Internal Stakeholders Perception of Teacher Education Curriculum Content in Makerere and Kyambogo Universities. Education Quarterly Reviews, 4(1), 71-84. https://doi.org/10.31014/aior.1993.04.01.175

Lam, A. M. H. (2023). Making sense of interdisciplinary general education curriculum design: case study of common core curriculum at the university of hong kong. ECNU review of education, 6(3), 410-432. https://doi.org/10.1177/20965311221142888

Prommaboon, T., Boongthong, S., & Nuangchalerm, P. (2022). STREAM Education Curriculum for Primary Thai Language Teachers and School Implementation. Journal of Educational Issues, 8(1), 84-100. https://doi.org/10.5296/jei.v8i1.19465

Queen, C., Schiffecker, S., & Paton, V. O. (2022). Critical Pedagogy for Health Professions and International Learning Experiences. Journal of Comparative and International Higher Education, 14(2), 126-137. https://doi.org/10.32674/jcihe.v14i2.3927

Shanks, N. G. (2018). A dominant narrative in economics?: Preservice teachers and pluralism in a social studies methods class. JSSE-Journal of Social Science Education, 17(3), 19-33. https://doi.org/10.4119/UNIBI/jsse‐v17‐i3‐1774.

Downloads

Published

2026-04-30

How to Cite

PLURALISME PARADIGMA EKONOMI DALAM PEMBELAJARAN: SYSTEMATIC LITERATURE REVIEW. (2026). Research And Development Journal Of Education (RDJE), 12(01), 307-319. https://doi.org/10.30998/4cersj43