Pengembangan Instrumen Tes Berpikir Kritis Berbasis Sintesis Watson-Glaser dan Ennis

Authors

  • Tariza Fairuz Universitas Negeri Medan Author
  • Nadia Mubarokah Universitas Negeri Medan Author
  • Sri Masnita Pardosi Universitas Negeri Medan Author
  • Shofia Lubis Universitas Negeri Medan Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.30998/sap.v10i3.1464

Keywords:

berpikir kritis, Ennis, Watson-Glaser, instrumen tes

Abstract

The limitations of science assessment instruments that are able to measure critical thinking skills comprehensively, particularly in integrating cognitive dimensions and operational indicators into one complete construct, is still a problem in learning evaluation practices. This study aimed to develop a critical thinking test instrument based on the synthesis of the Watson–Glaser and Ennis frameworks in the context of science education. The research employed a Research and Development approach using the ADDIE model, consisting of analysis, design, development, implementation, and evaluation stages. The instrument was developed by synthesizing Watson–Glaser critical thinking components and Ennis’ operational indicators, which were then translated into multiple-choice reasoning-based items on wave and optics topics. Expert validation was conducted to evaluate content, construct, and language aspects. The instrument was tested on 38 undergraduate students of science education in Universitas Negeri Medan. The results indicated that the instrument was valid based on expert judgment and demonstrated adequate construct validity. Reliability analysis using Cronbach’s Alpha yielded a coefficient of 0.876, indicating high internal consistency. These findings suggest that the developed instrument reliably measures critical thinking skills in accordance with the synthesized Watson–Glaser and Ennis framework. The instrument can serve as an alternative assessment tool for science learning that emphasizes critical reasoning.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

[1] S. Mahany dkk., “Peran Problem-Based Learning dalam Pengembangan Berpikir Kritis pada Pembelajaran Fisika: Analisis Bibliometrik,” Epistemic: Scientific Thinking and Literacy, vol. 1, no. 1, hlm. 1–11, Agu 2025, doi: 10.58706/epistemic.v1n1.p1-11.

[2] Sulbiana, A. Haris, dan A. Yani, “Kemampuan Berpikir Kritis Dalam Pembelajaran Fisika Peserta Didik Kelas XI MIPA SMA Negeri 3 Makassar,” Jurnal Sains dan Pendidikan Fisika, vol. 20, no. 2, hlm. 174–189, Agu 2024, doi: 10.35580/jspf.v20i2.3690.

[3] R. Setiawan, N. Lestari, dan N. Apsari, “Berpikir Kritis dalam Fisika Menggunakan Aplikasi Mobile,” Jurnal Pembelajaran IPA dan Aplikasinya (QUANTUM), vol. 1, no. 2, hlm. 33–43, 2021.

[4] F. Naswar, M. H. Rahman, dan N. A. Rahman, “Pengaruh Kemampuan Berpikir Kritis Terhadap Kemampuan Literasi Sains Siswa Kelas VIII SMP Negeri 7 Kota Ternate Pada Konsep Getaran Dan Gelombang Dengan Menggunakan Model Pembelajaran Discovery Learning,” SAINTIFIK@: Jurnal Pendidikan MIPA, vol. 8, no. 1, Mar 2023, doi: 10.33387/saintifik.v8i1.6218.

[5] M. Makhrus, S. Ayub, N. Nyoman Putu Sri Verawati, A. Busyairi, dan P. Studi Pendidikan Fisika, “Kemampuan Berpikir Kritis Mahasiswa pada Materi Optik Saat Proses Pembelajaran dengan CCM-CCA Berbantuan Eksperimen Virtual,” Kappa Journal, vol. 4, no. 2, hlm. 2549–2950, Des 2020, [Daring]. Tersedia pada: http://e-journal.hamzanwadi.ac.id/index.php/kpj/index

[6] H. Imtihani, F. Bakri, dan S. Sunaryo, “Pengembangan Video Pembelajaran Untuk Melatih Keterampilan Berpikir Kritis Siswa Sma Pada Materi Gelombang Bunyi Dan Cahaya,” dalam Prosiding Seminar Nasional Fisika (E-Journal), ProdiPendidikan Fisika dan Fisika UNJ, 2023. doi: 10.21009/03.1102.pf34.

[7] E. Susilowati, D. Rusdiana, dan I. Kaniawati, “Efektivitas Perkuliahan Gelombang Dan Optika Berbasis Scaffolding Terhadap Peningkatan Kebiasaan Berpikir Kritis Mahasiswa,” Jurnal Wahana Pendidikan Fisika, vol. 2, no. 2, hlm. 68–70, 2020, [Daring]. Tersedia pada: http://www.ccsnh.edu/documents/CCSNH

[8] A. D. Pramudita dkk., “Analisis Pengaruh Kemampuan Berpikir Kritis Terhadap Pemahaman Konsep Gelombang Elektromagnetik Mahasiswa Pendidikan Fisika,” Jurnal Ilmiah Wahana Pendidikan, vol. 9, no. 14, hlm. 105–113, 2023, doi: 10.5281/zenodo.8170616.

[9] F. P. Lestari, F. Ahmadi, dan R. Rochmad, “The Critical Thinking Ability in Watson-Glaser Framework in Fourth Grade Students,” Educational Management, vol. 9, no. 2, hlm. 233–240, 2020, [Daring]. Tersedia pada: http://journal.unnes.ac.id/sju/index.php/eduman

[10] N. N. S. P. Verawati, S. Prayogi, M. Y. Yusup, dan H. Taha, “Development of the Test Instrument for Measuring Students’ Critical Thinking Abilities on Fluid Material,” Prisma Sains : Jurnal Pengkajian Ilmu dan Pembelajaran Matematika dan IPA IKIP Mataram, vol. 8, no. 1, hlm. 46, Jul 2020, doi: 10.33394/j-ps.v8i1.2487.

[11] T. Fairuz, “Assessment Instrument of Critical Thinking Skills for Student on Light Interaction with Organisms,” Jurnal Studi Guru dan Pembelajaran, vol. 4, no. 1, hlm. 67, 2021, doi: 10.30605/jsgp.4.1.2021.500.

[12] I. G. E. Saputra, I. N. Jampel, dan I. G. L. A. Parwata, “Pengembangan Instrumen Penilaian Kemampuan Berpikir Kritis Peserta Didik Kelas VIII SMP pada Materi Getaran dan Gelombang,” Jurnal Pendidikan dan Pembelajaran Sains Indonesia (JPPSI), vol. 5, no. 2, hlm. 154–164, Okt 2022, doi: 10.23887/jppsi.v5i2.51772.

[13] H. Haryanti dan P. Susongko, “Pengembangan Instrumen Penilaian Berpikir Kritis Menurut FACIONE Pada Pembelajaran IPA Di Sekolah Menengah Pertama Berbasis Model Rasch,” PSEJ (Pancasakti Science Education Journal), vol. 9, no. 1, hlm. 78–87, Nov 2024, doi: 10.24905/psej.v9i2.207.

[14] Gusti Ngurah Arya Surya Wangsa, Nyoman Dantes, dan I Wayan Suastra, “Pengembangan Instrumen Kemampuan Berpikir Kritis Dan Hasil Belajar IPA Kelas V SD Gugus IV Kecamatan Gerokgak,” PENDASI: Jurnal Pendidikan Dasar Indonesia, vol. 5, no. 1, hlm. 139–150, Mar 2021, doi: 10.23887/jurnal_pendas.v5i1.267.

[15] P. A. Gunawan, H. Ansori, dan I. Budiarti, “Analisis Berpikir Kritis Siswa Berkategori Tinggi Menggunakan Watson-Glaser Critical Thinking Appraisal Ditinjau Dari Jenis Kelamin,” EDU-MAT: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, vol. 11, no. 2, hlm. 276, Okt 2023, doi: 10.20527/edumat.v11i2.16133.

[16] N. U. Sa’idah, E. Handoyo, Supriyadi, dan W. Sumarni, “Development of a Critical Thinking Assessment Instrument for Earth Changes in Elementary School Science Lessons,” Journal of Environmental and Science Education, vol. 5, no. 1, hlm. 30–37, Apr 2025, doi: 10.15294/jese.v5i1.6297.

[17] A. Asma, M. T. A, S. Potiua, dan W. Y. Anuli, “Critical Reasoning Assessment Instruments on Statistics Material for Phase D Students: Validity and Reliability,” Jurnal Penelitian dan Pengembangan Pendidikan, vol. 9, no. 2, hlm. 424–433, Jul 2025, doi: 10.23887/jppp.v9i2.92251.

[18] M. Widiastuti dan N. Hamidi, “Analisis Keterampilan Berpikir Kritis Siswa Sekolah Menengah Kejuruan Menggunakan Tes W-GCTA,” Jurnal Pendidikan Akuntansi Indonesia, vol. 23, no. 2, hlm. 22–36, 2025.

Downloads

Published

2026-04-05

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

Fairuz, T., Mubarokah, N., Pardosi, S. M., & Lubis, S. (2026). Pengembangan Instrumen Tes Berpikir Kritis Berbasis Sintesis Watson-Glaser dan Ennis. SAP (Susunan Artikel Pendidikan), 10(3), 438-447. https://doi.org/10.30998/sap.v10i3.1464