Optimalisasi Sistem Informasi Akademik Berbasis Website dalam Mewujudkan Layanan Publik Berintegritas

Panji Suroso; Danny Ivanno Ritonga; Helsiana Sigalingging; Tri Danu Satria; Lanang Riyadi

doi:10.30998/sap.v11i1.2760

Authors

Panji Suroso Universitas Negeri Medan Author
Danny Ivanno Ritonga State University of Medan Author
Helsiana Sigalingging State University of Medan Author
Tri Danu Satria State University of Medan Author
Lanang Riyadi State University of Medan Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.30998/sap.v11i1.2760

Keywords:

sistem informasi akademik, tata kelola digital, integritas layanan publik, pendidikan tinggi, kepuasan mahasiswa

Abstract

Conventional academic services in higher education often face information fragmentation and limited document access, which hinder transparency. This study aims to analyze the optimization of a website-based academic information system in strengthening public service integrity at the Department of Sendratasik, Universitas Negeri Medan. A mixed-methods design was employed, combining quantitative surveys and qualitative interviews. A total of 186 active students at Universitas Negeri Medan participated in the survey to measure satisfaction levels before and after six months of system implementation in 2025/2026 , while 12 key informants were interviewed regarding governance challenges. The results showed that average student satisfaction increased significantly from 63% to 86% following the development of four departmental websites. The highest improvement occurred in digital document availability and academic information transparency. Qualitative findings revealed initial constraints involving limited infrastructure, varying digital literacy, and the absence of standardized digital procedures. Optimizing this system strengthens transparency, accountability, and digital documentation. The study concludes that website-based academic information systems serve as strategic instruments for digital integrity governance to enhance student satisfaction in higher education. It recommends strengthening digital policies, system integration, and continuous human resource development

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

[1] E. N. Prihatini, M. Mayarni, H. As’ari, Z. Zulkarnaini, dan E. Desiarti, “Telaah Respon Lingkungan Sosial Kampus Terhadap Agile Governance dan Zona Integritas di Perguruan Tinggi,” Anterior Jurnal, vol. 24, no. 3, hlm. 52–60, Sep 2025, doi: 10.33084/anterior.v24i3.10211.

[2] R. S. Pressman, Software Engineering: a Practitioner’s Approach. Palgrave macmillan, 2005.

[3] P. Suroso, T. D. Satria, dan L. Riyadi, “Penggunaan Mobile Learning Notewise dalam Pembelajaran Komputer Musik dengan Technology Acceptance Model Berbasis Sosial Budaya,” Jurnal EDUCATIO: Jurnal Pendidikan Indonesia, vol. 12, no. 1, hlm. 34–43, Apr 2026, doi: 10.29210/1202626836.

[4] B. K. Oduro dan A. Agbevade, “The Role of E‐Governance in Promoting Government Accountability and Transparency in Ghana,” THE ELECTRONIC JOURNAL OF INFORMATION SYSTEMS IN DEVELOPING COUNTRIES, vol. 92, no. 2, Mar 2026, doi: 10.1002/isd2.70053.

[5] Z. L. Hamzah, N. A. Sulaiman, dan M. M. Ismail, “Public Governance, Service Delivery and Institutional Image,” dalam Concepts of Corporate Governance and Public Governance, Singapore: Springer Nature Singapore, 2026, hlm. 155–169. doi: 10.1007/978-981-95-2449-5_8.

[6] A. A. Zulfa, T. Ibrahim, dan O. Arifudin, “Peran Sistem Informasi Akademik Berbasis Web dalam Upaya Meningkatkan Efektivitas dan Efisiensi Pengelolaan Akademik di Perguruan Tinggi,” Jurnal Tahsinia, vol. 6, no. 1, hlm. 115–134, Jan 2025, doi: 10.57171/JT.V6I1.615.

[7] Y. Akbar dan Y. Bachtiar, “Analisis Penerimaan Pengguna Aplikasi Kipin School Menggunakan Metode Technology Acceptance Model (TAM),” Jurnal Indonesia : Manajemen Informatika dan Komunikasi, vol. 5, no. 3, hlm. 2827–2839, Sep 2024, doi: 10.35870/jimik.v5i3.1013.

[8] J. Junisnaini, B. Sulfiani, dan N. Dewi, “Pengaruh Kualitas Sistem Informasi Akademik (SIAKAD) terhadap Kepuasan Mahasiswa,” Journal of Social and Scientific Education, vol. 1, no. 3, hlm. 119–128, Okt 2024, doi: 10.58230/josse.v1i3.321.

[9] A. I. P. Putra dan M. Roni, “Good Governance dalam Lingkungan Pendidikan Tinggi (Good University Governance),” Al-Idarah : Jurnal Kependidikan Islam, vol. 11, no. 2, hlm. 226–236, Des 2021, doi: 10.24042/ALIDARAH.V11I2.10065.

[10] W. Andayani, D. Dahlia, E. Putrianti, O. Wisdaningrum, P. Putranto, dan Y. Yanuarisa, “Penguatan Good Governance: Pengalaman Penerapan Electronic Government Pemerintah Daerah di Indonesia,” Jurnal Aktiva : Riset Akuntansi dan Keuangan, vol. 6, no. 2, hlm. 116–131, Jul 2024, doi: 10.52005/aktiva.v6i2.240.

[11] Humas Ditjen Diktiristek, “Dukung Transformasi Digital Pendidikan Tinggi, Ditjen Diktiristek Luncurkan Empat Aplikasi dan Satu Fasilitas Baru,” Kementerian Pendidikan, Kebudayaan, Riset, dan Teknologi. Diakses: 20 Mei 2026. [Daring]. Tersedia pada: https://kemdiktisaintek.go.id/news/article/dukung-transformasi-digital-pendidikan-tinggi-ditjen-diktiristek-luncurkan-empat-aplikasi-dan-satu-fasilitas-baru

[12] H. Susanto, I. C. A. Phoek, dan A. P. Tjilen, “Menuju Tata Kelola Universitas yang Adaptif dan Berbasis Bukti: Mengoptimalkan Sistem Administrasi untuk Keunggulan Akademik,” Jurnal Ilmu Sosial dan Humaniora, vol. 1, no. 3, hlm. 766–779, Jul 2025, doi: 10.63822/WHNSCV79.

[13] N. Zaky dan T. D. Satria, “Tata Kelola dan Manajemen Pendidikan Pada Masa Pendemi Covid-19 Berbasis E-Learning di Prodi Pendidikan Musik Universitas Negeri Medan,” dalam Seminar Nasional 2022-NBM Arts, Medan: Universitas HKBP Nomensen, 2022.

[14] P. W. Bowen, R. Rose, dan A. Pilkington, “Mixed Methods - Theory and Practice. Sequential, Explanatory Approach,” International Journal of Quantitative and Qualitative Research Methods, vol. 5, no. 2, hlm. 2056–3620, 2017.

[15] A. Castleberry dan A. Nolen, “Thematic Analysis of Qualitative Research Data: Is it as Easy as it Sounds?,” Curr. Pharm. Teach. Learn., vol. 10, no. 6, hlm. 807–815, Jun 2018, doi: 10.1016/j.cptl.2018.03.019.

[16] B. J. Breitmayer, L. Ayres, dan K. A. Knafl, “Triangulation in Qualitative Research: Evaluation of Completeness and Confirmation Purposes,” Image: the Journal of Nursing Scholarship, vol. 25, no. 3, hlm. 237–243, Sep 1993, doi: 10.1111/j.1547-5069.1993.tb00788.x.

[17] H. S. Adelman dan L. Taylor, “Systemic Change for School Improvement,” Journal of Educational and Psychological Consultation, vol. 17, no. 1, hlm. 55–77, Apr 2007, doi: 10.1080/10474410709336590.

[18] A. Hami dan D. Anggraini, “Kualitas Layanan Sistem Informasi Akademik (SIAKAD) terhadap Kepuasan Mahasiswa sebagai Pengguna,” Jurnal Informasi dan Komputer, vol. 10, no. 1, hlm. 121–129, Apr 2022, doi: 10.35959/jik.v10i1.299.

[19] F. Hidayat dan A. P. Kharismaputra, “Evaluasi Pengaruh Persepsi Kegunaan dan Kemudahan terhadap Penggunaan PILAM dan E-Jurnal Menggunakan <i>Technology Acceptance Model </i>,” Adopsi Teknologi dan Sistem Informasi (ATASI), vol. 4, no. 2, hlm. 204–213, Sep 2025, doi: 10.30872/atasi.v4i2.3576.

[20] H. J. Kim, A. J. Hong, dan H.-D. Song, “The Roles of Academic Engagement and Digital Readiness in Students’ Achievements in University E-learning Environments,” International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, vol. 16, no. 1, hlm. 21, Des 2019, doi: 10.1186/s41239-019-0152-3.

[21] B. Birdayanthi, Y. Yusriadi, dan I. Ikmal, “Accountability and Transparency in Public Administration for Improved Service Delivery,” Journal Social Civilecial, vol. 3, no. 1, hlm. 34–47, 2025, doi: 10.71435/610633.

[22] L. S. Sariene, C. C. Pérez, dan A. M. L. Hernández, “Expanding the Actions of Open Government in Higher Education Sector: From Web Transparency to Open Science,” PLoS One, vol. 15, no. 9, hlm. e0238801, Sep 2020, doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0238801.

[23] D. F. Westerheijden, B. Stensaker, dan M. J. Rosa, Ed., Quality Assurance In Higher Education, vol. 20. Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands, 2007. doi: 10.1007/978-1-4020-6012-0.

[24] A. Singha, “Governing by Design: A Digital-Native Framework to Resolve the Autonomy-Accountability Paradox in Bangladeshi Higher Education,” hlm. 1–25, Sep 2025, doi: 10.2139/SSRN.5752485.

[25] M. Khotami, “The Concept Of Accountability In Good Governance,” dalam Proceedings of the International Conference on Democracy, Accountability and Governance (ICODAG 2017), Paris, France: Atlantis Press, 2017. doi: 10.2991/icodag-17.2017.6.

[26] G. M. Mudacumura, “Accountability and Transparency: Cornerstones of Development and Democratic Governance,” dalam Challenges to Democratic Governance in Developing Countries, Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2014, hlm. 37–55. doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-03143-9_3.

[27] A. Pambudi, S. Haryaningsih, F. D. Andriani, dan S. A. Berliyanti, “The Impact of Bureaucracy on Higher Education: Lessons from Indonesia,” Policy Futures in Education, vol. 23, no. 8, hlm. 1446–1467, Nov 2025, doi: 10.1177/14782103251367218.

[28] L. Stirton dan M. Lodge, “Transparency Mechanisms: Building Publicness into Public Services,” J. Law Soc., vol. 28, no. 4, hlm. 471–489, Des 2001, doi: 10.1111/1467-6478.00199.

[29] V. Schmidt dan M. Wood, “Conceptualizing Throughput Legitimacy: Procedural Mechanisms of Accountability, Transparency, Inclusiveness and Openness in EU Governance,” Public Adm., vol. 97, no. 4, hlm. 727–740, Des 2019, doi: 10.1111/padm.12615.

[30] C. O’Connell, C. O’Siochru, dan N. Rao, “Academic Perspectives on Metrics: Procedural Justice as a Key Factor in Evaluations of Fairness,” Studies in Higher Education, vol. 46, no. 3, hlm. 548–562, Mar 2021, doi: 10.1080/03075079.2019.1643306.

[31] E. E. Kossek, A. Ollier-Malaterre, M. D. Lee, S. Pichler, dan D. T. Hall, “Line Managers’ Rationales for Professionals’ Reduced-Load Work in Embracing and Ambivalent Organizations,” Hum. Resour. Manage., vol. 55, no. 1, hlm. 143–171, Jan 2016, doi: 10.1002/hrm.21722.