Mapping Publication Trends dalam Pendidikan STEM dari Database Scopus: Analisis Bibliometrik

Bagus Pratomo Nusantoro; Paidi Hw; Kintan Limiansi

doi:10.30998/sap.v10i3.976

Authors

Bagus Pratomo Nusantoro Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta Author
Paidi Hw Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta Author
Kintan Limiansi Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.30998/sap.v10i3.976

Keywords:

Pendidikan STEM, Analisis Bibliometrik, Tren Publikasi, Scopus

Abstract

The rapid growth of publications in STEM education highlights the need for a systematic mapping to better understand the direction of research development. This study aims to map publication trends in STEM education research indexed in the Scopus database through bibliometric analysis to identify research development, dominant themes, and future directions. The study employed a descriptive quantitative approach using bibliometric methods. Data were collected from Scopus through PRISMA stages consisting of identification, screening, eligibility, and inclusion, resulting in 377 final articles from 798 initial records, which were analyzed using Biblioshiny and VOSviewer. The findings show that STEM education publications have increased significantly, particularly since 2015, with an annual growth rate of 22.88%. The United States was the leading contributor, followed by China and Australia, while international collaboration indicates the strengthening role of Asia-Pacific countries. Keyword co-occurrence analysis reveals that STEM education research is mainly focused on STEM integration in learning, student learning outcomes, critical thinking and assessment, and the use of technology in teaching and learning..

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

[1] G. Al Murshidi, “STEM education in the United Arab Emirates: Challenges and possibilities,” International Journal of Learning, Teaching and Educational Research, vol. 18, no. 12, hlm. 316–332, 2019, doi: 10.26803/ijlter.18.12.18.

[2] B. Freeman, S. Marginson, dan R. Tytler, “An international view of STEM education,” dalam STEM Education 2.0: Myths and Truths - What Has K-12 STEM Education Research Taught Us?, Brill, 2019, hlm. 349–363. doi: 10.1163/9789004405400_019.

[3] H. Salzman dan D. Douglas, “STEM education and workforce development: The history, politics, and evidence,” dalam International Encyclopedia of Education, 4 ed., Elsevier, 2022, hlm. 358–369. doi: 10.1016/B978-0-12-818630-5.13065-9.

[4] A. Bozkurt, H. Ucar, G. Durak, dan S. Idin, “The current state of the art in STEM research: A systematic review study,” Cypriot Journal of Educational Sciences, vol. 14, no. 3, hlm. 374–383, 2019, doi: 10.18844/cjes.v14i3.3447.

[5] E. Kurniati, H. Suwono, I. Ibrohim, A. Suryadi, dan M. Saefi, “International scientific collaboration and research topics on STEM education: A systematic review,” Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, vol. 18, no. 4, 2022, doi: 10.29333/ejmste/11903.

[6] D. Yang, X. Wu, J. Liu, dan J. Zhou, “CiteSpace-based global science, technology, engineering, and mathematics education knowledge mapping analysis,” Front. Psychol., vol. 13, 2023, doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1094959.

[7] M. Jakfar, U. A. Deta, N. A. Lestari, F. Khaleyla, R. D. Saputri, dan A. Arrosyidi, “Global trend of STEM Education for the SDGs of the last decade: A bibliometric analysis,” dalam E3S Web of Conferences, EDP Sciences, 2024, hlm. 04020.

[8] I. A. Khalil, A. A. L. Al Zahrani, B. Awaji, dan M. Mohsen, “Mapping the future of innovation: A bibliometric analysis of STEM education trends in K-12,” International Journal of Learning, Teaching and Educational Research, vol. 23, no. 8, hlm. 76–97, 2024, doi: 10.26803/ijlter.23.8.5.

[9] K. Ma dan B.-H. Hui, “A bibliometric analysis of literature on attitudes in STEM education in 2008–2022,” Journal of Baltic Science Education, vol. 22, no. 6, hlm. 1038–1049, 2023, doi: 10.33225/jbse/23.22.1038.

[10] T. N. T. Thanh, T. T. H. Nguyen, T. H.-C. Le, T. H. D. Ha, V. N. T. Thanh, dan P. H. Thanh, “Science mapping research of STEM in primary schools: A bibliometric analysis from Scopus database (2004–2024),” Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, vol. 21, no. 6, 2025, doi: 10.29333/ejmste/16510.

[11] Y. Wardat, A. A. H. Al-Omari, O. M. Khasawneh, dan H. G. Rawagah, “Mapping the landscape: A bibliometric analysis of integrating STEM into science and mathematics classes,” Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, vol. 21, no. 5, hlm. 1–16, 2025, doi: 10.29333/ejmste/16394.

[12] F. Chen dan G. Chen, “Learning analytics in inquiry-based learning: a systematic review,” Educational Technology Research and Development, vol. 73, no. 4, hlm. 2131–2161, 2025, doi: 10.1007/s11423-025-10507-9.

[13] E. Irawan dan R. Purwasih, “Tren dan arah baru penelitian pendidikan matematika: Analisis bibliometrik publikasi terindeks Scopus peneliti Indonesia,” IMEJ Indonesian Mathematics Education Journal, vol. 1, no. 2, hlm. 171–190, 2024.

[14] A. W. P. Wardhana, R. Sugihartati, T. A. Salim, dan A. R. Ramadhan, “Analisis bibliometrik terhadap perkembangan topik penelitian standarisasi kualitas perpustakaan di Indonesia pada database Scopus tahun 2018–2023 menggunakan VOSviewer dan CitNetExplorer,” Media Pustakawan, vol. 30, no. 3, hlm. 245–259, 2023.

[15] A. T. L. Tiara, T. A. Salim, dan M. P. Wibowo, “Pemetaan dan analisis bibliometrik tren penelitian: Manajemen diseminasi informasi di Scopus tahun 2018–2023 dengan VOSviewer dan RStudio Bibliometrix,” Tik Ilmeu: Jurnal Ilmu Perpustakaan dan Informasi, vol. 8, no. 2, hlm. 267–282, 2024.

[16] Y. Ananda, E. Rizal, dan A. S. Rohman, “Pemetaan pengetahuan terhadap perkembangan penelitian kebutuhan informasi pada database Scopus menggunakan VOSViewer,” Informatio: Journal of Library and Information Science, vol. 5, no. 1, hlm. 49–66, 2025.

[17] A. Filiz dan C. Albay, “Global trends in STEM-based special education research: Bibliometric mapping of the literature,” British Journal of Special Education, 2025, doi: 10.1111/1467-8578.70056.

[18] Z. Kataeva, N. Durrani, Z. Izekenova, dan V. Roshka, “Investigating trends and developments in academic research and publications on gender and STEM: A bibliometric analysis,” Sage Open, vol. 15, no. 2, 2025, doi: 10.1177/21582440251338191.

[19] H. Chen, Y. P. Tsang, dan C. H. Wu, “When text mining meets science mapping in the bibliometric analysis: A review and future opportunities,” International Journal of Engineering Business Management, vol. 15, 2023, doi: 10.1177/18479790231222349.

[20] S. Syamsidar, “Collaboration patterns in recent STEM education research: A bibliometric perspective,” International Journal of Basic and Applied Science, vol. 14, no. 4, hlm. 250–255, 2025, doi: 10.14419/grfje289.

[21] S. Saleng dan E. Syatriana, “Global Trends in Local Wisdom-Based School Education: A Comprehensive Bibliometric Review (2009–2025),” Journal of Local Wisdom in Education, vol. 1, no. 1, hlm. 48–71, 2025.

[22] S. Saleng dan E. Syatriana, “Journal of Local Wisdom in Education Global Trends in Local Wisdom-Based School Education: A Comprehensive Bibliometric Review (2009-2025),” vol. 1, no. 1, hlm. 48–71, 2025, doi: 10.26618/8fjph017.

[23] H. Santoso, P. Harjati, A. Sujarwanta, dan A. Sutanto, “Unveiling Research Gaps in Biology Teaching Materials for Secondary Science Education: A Bibliometric Review of Scopus (2000–2024),” International Journal of Learning, Teaching and Educational Research, vol. 24, no. 6, hlm. 689–709, 2025, doi: 10.26803/ijlter.24.6.32.

[24] R. Santos, D. Anderson, dan M. Milner-Bolotin, “Research trends in international science, technology, engineering, and mathematics education conference series: An analysis of a decade of proceedings,” Front. Educ. (Lausanne)., vol. 7, 2023, doi: 10.3389/feduc.2022.1099658.