Identifying Prospective Physics Teachers' Understanding of Scientific Inquiry
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.30998/266ssd45Keywords:
Prospective physics teachers; understanding of scientific inquiry; VASIAbstract
This study aims to investigate the understanding of scientific inquiry among prospective physics teachers' and to identify any gaps between the procedural and philosophical aspects of inquiry. Understanding this profile is uniquely crucial for physics educators, as the discipline's heavy mathematical load often obscures the philosophical nature of science. This qualitative descriptive study involved 27 prospective physics teachers at Malang State University as respondents. The instrument used was the Views About Scientific Inquiry (VASI) questionnaire, which covers eight aspects of scientific inquiry. The analysis reveals a distinct procedural-epistemological gap. Based on the VASI rubric, all participants were categorized as informed on procedural aspects, including question-guided procedures, the impact of procedures on results, the consistency of conclusions with the data, and the synthesis of data with prior knowledge. Conversely, notable naive and mixed views emerged regarding philosophical aspects, particularly regarding the obligation of hypotheses, the myth of a single scientific method, and the role of subjectivity in data interpretation. These findings suggest that participants' prior laboratory experiences may have heavily emphasized technical verification practicums rather than epistemological reflection. Therefore, teacher education programs need to integrate an explicit, reflective instructional approach to the nature of scientific inquiry to equip prospective teachers with a comprehensive understanding of science before entering the professional world.
Downloads
References
Abd-El-Khalick, F. (2012). Examining the Sources for our Understandings about Science: Enduring conflations and critical issues in research on nature of science in science education. International Journal of Science Education, 34(3), 353-374. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2011.629013
Adisendjaja, Y. H., Rustaman, N., Redjeki, S., & Satori, D. A. (2016). Gambaran Pandangan Mahasiswa Calon Guru Biologi dan Guru IPA tentang Inkuiri Ilmiah. Jurnal Pengajaran Matematika dan Ilmu Pengetahuan Alam, 21(1), 73-81. https://doi.org/10.18269/jpmipa.v21i1.36260
Aditomo, A., & Klieme, E. (2020). Forms of inquiry-based science instruction and their relations with learning outcomes: evidence from high and low-performing education systems. International Journal of Science Education, 42(4), 504-525. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2020.1716093
Bartos, S., & Lederman, N. (2014). Teachers’ Knowledge Structures for Nature of Science and Scientific Inquiry: Conceptions and Classroom Practice. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 51(9). https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21168
Baykara, H., & Yakar, Z. (2020). Preservice Science Teachers ’ Views about Scientific Inquiry : The Case of Turkey and Fen Öğretmen Adaylarının Bilimsel Araştırmaya Yönelik Görüşleri : Türkiye ve Tayvan Örneği Öz. 11(2), 161–192. https://doi.org/10.17569/tojqi.618950
Bell, R., Blair, L., Crawford, B., & Lederman, N. (2003). Just do it? Impact of a science apprenticeship program on students’ understanding of the nature of science and scientific inquiry. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 40(5), 487–509. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.10086
Campanile, M., Lederman, N., & Kampourakis, K. (2013). Mendelian Genetics as a Platform for Teaching About Nature of Science and Scientific Inquiry: The Value of Textbooks. Science & Education, 24(1). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-013-9607-4
Cigdemoglu, C. & Koseoglu, F. (2019). Improving Science Teachers’ Views about Scientific Inquiry: Reflections from a Professional Development Program Aiming to Advance Science Centre-School Curricula Integration. Science & Education, 28(3–5), 439–469. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-019-00054-0
Creswell, J. W., & Poth, C. N. (2016). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches. Sage publications.
Duschl, R., & Grandy, R. (2013). Two Views About Explicitly Teaching Nature of Science. Science & Education, 22(1). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-012-9539-4
Erduran, S., Kaya, E., & Dagher, Z. R. (2018). From Lists in Pieces to Coherent Wholes: Nature of Science, Scientific Practices, and Science Teacher Education. BT - Science Education Research and Practice in Asia-Pacific and Beyond, 10(2), 3-24. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-5149-4_1
Etkina, E. (2015). Millikan award lecture: Students of physics—Listeners, observers, or collaborative participants in physics scientific practices? American Journal of Physics, 83(8), 669–679. https://doi.org/10.1119/1.4923181
Faikhamta, C. (2013). The Development of In-Service Science Teachers’ Understandings of and Orientations to Teaching the Nature of Science within a PCK-Based NOS Course. Research in Science Education, 43(4), 847–869. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-012-9283-4
Fraenkel, J. R., Wallen, N. E., & Hyun, H. H. (2019). How to design and evaluate research in education (10th ed.). McGraw-Hill Education.
Gaigher, E., Lederman, N., & Lederman, J. (2014). Knowledge about Inquiry: A study in South African high schools. International Journal of Science Education, 36(18), 3125–3147. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2014.954156
Gyllenpalm, J., Wickman, P.-O., & Holmgren, S. (2010). Teachers’ Language on Scientific Inquiry: Methods of Teaching or Methods of Inquiry?. International Journal of Science Education, 32(9), 1151-1172. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690902977457
Heron, P., & Meltzer, D. (2005). The future of physics education research: Intellectual challenges and practical concerns. American Journal of Physics, 73(4), 390-394. https://doi.org/10.1119/1.1858480
Hodson, D. (2014). Learning Science, Learning about Science, Doing Science: Different goals demand different learning methods. International Journal of Science Education, 36(15), 2534-2553. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2014.899722
Hofstein, A., & Lunetta, V. (2004). The Laboratory in Science Education: Foundations for the Twenty-First Century. Science Education, 88(1), 28-54. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.10106
Kemendikbudristek. (2022). Kurikulum untuk Pemulihan Pembelajaran. Kementerian Pendidikan, Kebudayaan, Riset, dan Teknologi.
Koponen, I. (2007). Models and Modelling in Physics Education: A Critical Re-analysis of Philosophical Underpinnings and Suggestions for Revisions. Science & Education, 16(1), 751–773. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-006-9000-7
Koponen, I., & Mäntylä, T. (2006). Generative Role of Experiments in Physics and in Teaching Physics: A Suggestion for Epistemological Reconstruction. Science & Education, 15(1), 31–54. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-005-3199-6
Lederman, J., Lederman, N., Bartos, S., Bartels, S., Antink-Meyer, A., & Schwartz, R. (2014). Meaningful Assessment of Learners’ Understandings About Scientific Inquiry-The Views About Scientific Inquiry (VASI) Questionnaire. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 51(1), 65-83. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21125
Lederman, N. G., Lederman, J. S., Nature, A., Lederman, N. G., Lederman, J. S., & Antink, A. (2013). Nature of Science and Scientific Inquiry as Contexts for the Learning of Science and Achievement of Scientific Literacy. International Journal of Education in Mathematics, Science and Technology (IJEMST), 1(3), 138-147. https://doi.org/10.46328/ijemst.v1i3.10
Lederman, N., & Lederman, J. (2019). Teaching and Learning of Nature of Scientific Knowledge and Scientific Inquiry: Building Capacity through Systematic Research-Based Professional Development. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 30(7), 737-762. https://doi.org/10.1080/1046560X.2019.1625572
Liang, L., Chen, S., Xian, C., Adams, A., & Monica, M. (2008). Assessing preservice elementary teachers’ views on the nature of scientific knowledge:A dual-response instrument. Asia-Pacific Forum on Science Learning and Teaching, 9(1), 1-20. https://www.eduhk.hk/apfslt/v9_issue1/liang/index.htm
Luehmann, A. (2007). Identity development as a lens to science teacher preparation. Science Education, 91(5), 822–839. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.20209
Mesci, G., & Schwartz, R. (2017). Changing Preservice Science Teachers’ Views of Nature of Science: Why Some Conceptions May be More Easily Altered than Others. Research in Science Education, 47(4), 329-351. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-015-9503-9
Michel, H., & Neumann, I. (2017). Nature of Science and Science Content Learning: The Relation Between Students’ Nature of Science Understanding and Their Learning About the Concept of Energy. Science & Education, 25(1), 951-975. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-016-9860-4
Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook. Sage publications.
Miles, M., Huberman, M., & Saldaña, J. (2013). Qualitative Data Analysis: A Methods Sourcebook. Sage publications.
Mundilarto, M. (2003). Membangun Karakter Melalui Pembelajaran Sains. Jurnal Pendidikan Karakter, 20(1), 153–163. https://doi.org/10.21831/jpk.v2i2.1436.
Osborne, J. (2014). Teaching Scientific Practices: Meeting the Challenge of Change. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 25(2), 177-196. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10972-014-9384-1
Schwartz, R. S., Lederman, J. S., & Enderle, P. J. (2023). Scientific Inquiry Literacy. In Handbook of Research on Science Education. Routledge, 3(4), 749–782. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780367855758-28
Smith, C., Maclin, D., Houghton, C., & Hennessey, M. (2000). Sixth-Grade Students’ Epistemologies of Science: The Impact of School Science Experiences on Epistemological Development. Cognition and Instruction - COGNITION INSTRUCT, 18(3), 349–422. https://doi.org/10.1207/S1532690XCI1803_3
Stott, A., & Hattingh, A. (2020). Pre-service teachers’ views about the nature of science and scientific inquiry: The South African case. South African Journal of Education, 40(1),51-86 . https://doi.org/10.15700/saje.v40n1a1573
Stylos, G., Christonasis, A., & Kotsis, K. (2023). Pre-service Primary Teachers’ Views about Scientific Inquiry. International Journal of Studies in Education and Science, 4(2), 100–112. https://doi.org/10.46328/ijses.66
Supeno, S., Astutik, S., & Lesmono, A. (2020). Pre-service science teachers’ understanding of scientific method for studying local environmental issues. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 485(1), 1-6. https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/485/1/012033
Wilcox, B., & Lewandowski, H. (2016). Research-Based Assessment of Students’ Beliefs about Experimental Physics: When is Gender a Factor?. Physical Review Physics Education Research, 12(2), 1-11. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevPhysEducRes.12.020130
Wong, S. L., & Hodson, D. (2010). More from the Horse’s Mouth: What scientists say about science as a social practice. International Journal of Science Education, 32(11), 1431–1463. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690903104465
Zahra, I. R., & Anjani, N. (2025). Identifikasi Pemahaman Calon Guru SD Mengenai Inkuiri Ilmiah. Jurnal Pendidikan MIPA, 15(2), 793–802. https://doi.org/10.23960/jpmipa.v26i1.30605
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Amira Setiyani, Nuril Munfaridah, Arif Hidayat (Author)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
