From Supporting Students to Designing Learning: Digital Pedagogy among Chemistry Pre-Service Teachers

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.30998/formatif.v16i2.1887

Keywords:

Digital competence, digital pedagogy, educational technology, inclusive pedagogy, pre-service teachers

Abstract

This study examines digital pedagogy among Indonesian pre-service chemistry teachers, with particular attention to patterns across pedagogical orientation, pedagogical practices, and digital pedagogical competence.. A descriptive-comparative quantitative survey design was employed, involving 158 respondents from seven Islamic teacher education institutions in Indonesia. Data were collected using a self-assessment instrument and analysed through descriptive statistics and independent-samples t-tests. The findings revealed a generally positive profile of digital pedagogy. Pedagogical orientation received the highest mean score (M = 3.59), followed by pedagogical practices (M = 3.58), while digital pedagogical competence recorded the lowest score (M = 3.53). Item-level analysis showed that respondents were more confident in supporting students through communication, participation, and positive classroom relationships than in designing learning through inclusive planning, assessment design, educational data use, and technology-supported evaluation. No statistically significant differences were found by gender or number of digital tools used (p > .05). The study suggests that digital pedagogy develops unevenly across domains. While pre-service teachers appear relatively well prepared to support students, they may be less prepared to design learning experiences that are inclusive, assessment-informed, and pedagogically purposeful. These findings highlight the need for chemistry teacher education programs to move beyond generic technology training and provide more structured opportunities for design-oriented, discipline-specific, and inclusive digital pedagogy development.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Abellán, J., & Fernández-Bustos, J. G. (2024). A brief report of teachers’ attitudes toward inclusion in Castilla-La Mancha, Spain. Revista Portuguesa de Educação, 37(2), e24023-e24023. https://doi.org/10.21814/rpe.30826

Adebisi, R. O. (2024). Equality and diversity in learning through differentiated instructions. KnE Social Sciences, 9(6), 75–86. https://doi.org/10.18502/kss.v9i6.15256

Andrade, H., & Valtcheva, A. (2009). Promoting learning and achievement through self-assessment. Theory Into Practice, 48(1), 12-19. https://doi.org/10.1080/00405840802577544

Asmayawati, Yufiarti, & Yetti, E. (2024). Pedagogical innovation and curricular adaptation in enhancing digital literacy: A local wisdom approach for sustainable development in Indonesia context. Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity, 10(1), 100233. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joitmc.2024.100233

Astari, & Yulianto, D. (2025). A bridging the digital divide in education: Disparities in google classroom utilization and technical challenges among urban and rural teachers. Journal of Education Technology, 9(2), 258-270. https://doi.org/10.23887/jet.v9i2.92897

Baglieri, S. (2024). Teaching, care, and inclusive education: A disability studies perspective. Educação & Realidade, 49. https://doi.org/10.1590/2175-6236141807vs02

Beltran, L. P. T. J., E. Cagape, W., Kristine M. Facun, L. P. T. E., Gizelle B. Fariolen, L. P. T. C., Pearl A. Pan, L. P. T. J., & C. Ompad, L. P. T. R. (2022). Teachers' Attitude Towards Inclusive Education. International Journal of Research Publications, 116(1). https://doi.org/10.47119/IJRP1001161120234412

Blyznyuk, O., & Hotsaniuk, T. (2024). Digital competence among the key components of future masters of primary education professional training: Theoretical interpretations. Journal of Vasyl Stefanyk Precarpathian National University, 11(1), 164-172. https://doi.org/10.15330/jpnu.11.1.164-172

Bondie, R. S., Dahnke, C., & Zusho, A. (2019). How does changing “one-size-fits-all” to Differentiated Instruction affect teaching? Review of Research in Education, 43(1), 336-362. https://doi.org/10.3102/0091732x18821130

Bourke, B. (2019). Connecting With Generation Z Through Social Media. In Preparing the Higher Education Space for Gen Z (pp. 124–147). IGI Global. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-5225-7763-8.ch007

Brussino, O. (2021). Building capacity for inclusive teaching: Policies and practices to prepare all teachers for diversity and inclusion. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/57fe6a38-en.

Chai, C. S., Koh, J. H. L., & Tsai, C. C. (2011). Exploring the factor structure of the constructs of Technological, Pedagogical, Content Knowledge (TPACK). The Asia-Pacific Education Researcher, 20(3), 595-603.

Charitaki, G., Kourti, I., Gregory, J. L., Ozturk, M., Ismail, Z., Alevriadou, A., Soulis, S.-G., Sakici, Ş., & Demirel, C. (2022). Teachers’ Attitudes Towards Inclusive Education: a Cross-National Exploration. Trends in Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1007/s43076-022-00240-0

Chattopadhyay, P. (2025). Bridging tradition and innovation: Descriptive insights into technology integration in teacher education. Bharati International Journal of Multidisciplinary Research and Development, 3(5), 154-161. https://doi.org/10.70798/Bijmrd/03050017

Cheek, A. E., Idol, W. A., Jones, J. L., & Holden, K. B. (2019). Infusing technology throughout teacher preparation programs to support preservice teacher development. The Journal of Special Education Apprenticeship, 8(2). https://doi.org/10.58729/2167-3454.1093

Coelho, F., Blázquez, F., & Cubo, S. (2017). Teacher training, attitudes and inclusion. International Journal of Technology and Inclusive Education, 6(1). https://doi.org/10.20533/ijtie.2047.0533.2017.0131

Collins, M. E. (2024). Technology-Based Instructional Methods. In Effective Teaching (pp. 343–358). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003523956-14

Dhakal, B. R. (2024). Differentiated Instruction: Tailoring learning for diverse learners. Sikshya, 40(54), 167-176.

Didmanidze, I., Geladze, D., Zaslavskyi, V., Motskobili, I., Akhvlediani, D., Zoidze, K., Beridze, Z., & Surmanidze, I. (2023, 13-15 Oct. 2023). Development of Technological Competence Through Digital Educational Activities. 2023 13th International Conference on Dependable Systems, Services and Technologies (DESSERT),

Febliza, A., Kadarohman, A., Aisyah, S., & Abdullah, N. (2025). Generation Z and the use of digital technology: A Review from 2014 to 2023. Jurnal Pendidikan Sains Indonesia, 13(1), 53–67. https://doi.org/10.24815/jpsi.v13i1.40797

Gilbert, J. K., & Treagust, D. (2009). Multiple Representations in Chemical Education. In Models and Modeling in Science Education. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-8872-8

Giunta, C. (2017). An Emerging Awareness of Generation Z Students for Higher Education Professors. Archives of Business Research, 5(4). https://doi.org/10.14738/abr.54.2962

Hatlevik, I. K. R., & Hatlevik, O. E. (2018). Examining the relationship between teachers’ ICT self-efficacy for educational purposes, collegial collaboration, lack of facilitation and the use of ICT in teaching practice. Frontiers in Psychology, 9, 935. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00935

Howard, S., Tondeur, J., Hutchison, N., Scherer, R., & Siddiq, F. (2022). A t(r)opical journey: Using text mining to explore teachers’ experiences in the Great Online Transition Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference, San Diego, CA, United States. https://www.learntechlib.org/p/220833.

Jones, L. L., & Kelly, R. M. (2015). Visualization: The Key to Understanding Chemistry Concepts. In Sputnik to Smartphones: A Half-Century of Chemistry Education (Vol. 1208, pp. 121-140). American Chemical Society. https://doi.org/10.1021/bk-2015-1208.ch008

Kilic, D., & Saglam, N. (2023). The use of self-assessment in improving pre-service teachers’ professional development. Science Insights Education Frontiers, 19(2), 3057-3071. https://doi.org/10.15354/sief.23.or436

Ngongpah, G., & Oni, O. Y. (2025). Exploring the impact of digital technologies in education: A comprehensive review. Asian Journal of Education and Social Studies, 51(6), 1254-1264. https://doi.org/10.9734/ajess/2025/v51i62071

Ntuli, E., & Nyarambi, A. (2018). Instructional Technology and Meaningful Learning. In Handbook of Research on Mobile Technology, Constructivism, and Meaningful Learning (pp. 44-67). IGI Global. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-5225-3949-0.ch003

Oigara, J. N. (2013). Integrating Technology in Teacher Education Programs. In K-12 Education: Concepts, Methodologies, Tools, and Applications (pp. 28–43). IGI Global. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-4666-2988-2.ch002

Prensky, M. (2001). Digital natives, digital immigrants part 2: Do they really think differently? On the Horizon: The International Journal of Learning Futures, 9(6), 1-6. https://doi.org/10.1108/10748120110424843

Quddus, L., Khalid, M., & Waris, M. A. K. (2019). Teachers’ self-assessment of their teaching effectiveness at higher secondary level in Pakistan: A case study FGIC 2nd Conference on Governance and Integrity,

Raharjo, R. S., & Rohmadi, S. H. (2025). Artificial intelligence in indonesian education: A critical review of ethical considerations, implementation challenges, and educational management perspectives. At-Tarbawi: Jurnal Kajian Kependidikan Islam, 10(1), 50-68. https://doi.org/10.22515/attarbawi.v10i1.12141

Reddy, S. L., & Bubonia, J. (2020). Technology in Education: Learning Opportunities for Teachers and Students. Journal of Family & Consumer Sciences, 112(1), 46-50. https://doi.org/10.14307/jfcs112.1.46

Redecker, C. (2017). European framework for the digital competence of educators: DigCompEdu. Publications Office of the European Union.

Saravanakumar, A., Raja, G. P., & Sivakumar, P. (2023). Transforming education: Perceptions and challenges of technology-enabled teacher education programmes. Open Access Research Journal of Engineering and Technology, 5(2). https://doi.org/10.53022/oarjet.2023.5.2.0077

Scherer, R., Siddiq, F., & Tondeur, J. (2019). The technology acceptance model (TAM): A meta-analytic structural equation modeling approach to explaining teachers’ adoption of digital technology in education. Computers & Education, 128, 13-35. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2018.09.009

Schmidt, D. A., Baran, E., Thompson, A. D., Mishra, P., Koehler, M. J., & Shin, T. S. (2009). Technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPACK): The development and validation of an assessment instrument for preservice teachers. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 42(2), 123-149. https://doi.org/10.1080/15391523.2009.10782544

Shulman, L. S. (1987). Knowldege and teaching: Foundations of the new reform. Harvard Educational Review, 57(1), 1-21.

Suprihatiningrum, J., Atika, I. N., Putranto, S., & Rofiah, N. H. (2025). Unpacking pedagogical knowledge of inclusive learning design among indonesian pre-service science teachers. Center for Educational Policy Studies Journal. https://doi.org/10.26529/cepsj.2139

Teo, T. (2011). Factors influencing teachers’ intention to use technology: Model development and test. Computers & Education, 57(4), 2432-2440. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2011.06.008

Tondeur, J., van Braak, J., Ertmer, P. A., & Ottenbreit-Leftwich, A. (2017). Understanding the relationship between teachers’ pedagogical beliefs and technology use in education: A systematic review of qualitative evidence. Educational Technology Research and Development, 65(3), 555-575. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-016-9481-2

Väätäjä, J. O., & Ruokamo, H. (2021). Conceptualizing dimensions and a model for digital pedagogy. Journal of Pacific Rim Psychology, 15. https://doi.org/10.1177/1834490921995395

Wang, S. (2023). A review of research exploring pre-service teacher education for the digital era. International Journal of Education and Humanities, 9(1), 188-193. https://doi.org/10.54097/ijeh.v9i1.9407

Wulayalin, K. A., & Suprihatiningrum, J. (2024). Creating accessible chemistry content for students with disabilities: Findings from schools providing inclusive education in indonesia. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, 10(5), 2199-2210. https://doi.org/10.29303/jppipa.v10i5.6755

Downloads

Published

2026-09-30

How to Cite

Suprihatiningrum, J., Sabrina, S. A., & Muhammad, Z. (2026). From Supporting Students to Designing Learning: Digital Pedagogy among Chemistry Pre-Service Teachers. Formatif : Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan MIPA, 16(2), 267-280. https://doi.org/10.30998/formatif.v16i2.1887