HALMATIKA: A Halma-Based Board Game for Learning Logarithm Concepts in Secondary Mathematics
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.30998/qdaptt30Keywords:
Logarithm concept; board game; game-based learning; learning media; secondary mathematicsAbstract
This study aimed to develop HALMATIKA, a Halma-based board game for learning logarithm concepts in secondary mathematics, and to examine its feasibility for classroom use. The study employed a research-and-development design using the ADDIE model, which comprises analysis, design, development, implementation, and evaluation. The needs analysis was conducted at SMA 2 Perguruan “Cikini” in South Jakarta through interviews with teachers and expert consultation. As a learning medium, HALMATIKA was designed by integrating the movement mechanics of the Halma board game with logarithm question cards, enabling students to engage in concept practice through interactive, collaborative gameplay. Material experts, media experts, and students evaluated the product. A field trial was conducted with 27 tenth-grade students. The findings showed that HALMATIKA achieved a mean score of 4.55 from material experts and 4.70 from media experts, indicating a high level of feasibility. Student responses also yielded a positive mean score of 4.21, suggesting that the medium was well accepted in the classroom. These findings indicate that HALMATIKA is a feasible learning medium for teaching logarithm concepts. The study implies that board game-based media can provide a more engaging learning environment and support the presentation of abstract mathematical concepts more interactively.
Downloads
References
Birgin, O., & Acar, H. (2022). The effect of computer-supported collaborative learning using GeoGebra software on 11th-grade students’ mathematics achievement in exponential and logarithmic functions. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 53(4), 872–889. https://doi.org/10.1080/0020739X.2020.1788186
Bragg, L. A. (2012). The effect of mathematical games on on-task behaviours in the primary classroom. Mathematics Education Research Journal, 24(4), 385–401. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13394-012-0045-4
Branch, R. M. (2009). Instructional Design: The ADDIE Approach. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-09506-6
Clark, D. B., Tanner-Smith, E. E., & Killingsworth, S. S. (2016). Digital games, design, and learning: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Review of Educational Research, 86(1), 79–122. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654315582065
Gruver, J. (2018). A trajectory for developing conceptual understanding of logarithmic relationships. The Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 50, 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmathb.2017.12.003
Kacmaz, G., & Dubé, A. K. (2022). Examining pedagogical approaches and types of mathematics knowledge in educational games: A meta-analysis and critical review. Educational Research Review, 35, 100428. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2021.100428
Kuper, E., & Carlson, M. (2020). Foundational ways of thinking for understanding the idea of logarithm. The Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 57, 100740. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmathb.2019.100740
Molenda, M. (2003). In search of the elusive ADDIE model. Performance Improvement, 42(5), 34–36. https://doi.org/10.1002/pfi.4930420508
Pan, Y., Ke, F., & Xu, X. (2022). A systematic review of the role of learning games in fostering mathematics education in K–12 settings. Educational Research Review, 36, 100448. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2022.100448
Plass, J. L., Homer, B. D., & Kinzer, C. K. (2015). Foundations of game-based learning. Educational Psychologist, 50(4), 258–283. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.2015.1122533
Polit, D. F., Beck, C. T., & Owen, S. V. (2007). Is the CVI an acceptable indicator of content validity? Appraisal and recommendations. Research in Nursing & Health, 30(4), 459–467. https://doi.org/10.1002/nur.20199
Russo, J., Kalogeropoulos, P., Bragg, L. A., & Heyeres, M. (2024). Non-digital games that promote mathematical learning in primary years students: A systematic review. Education Sciences, 14(2), 200. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci14020200
Skillen, J., Berner, V.-D., & Seitz-Stein, K. (2018). The rule counts! Acquisition of mathematical competencies with a number board game. The Journal of Educational Research, 111(5), 554–563. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220671.2017.1313187
Stohlmann, M. S. (2023). Categorization of game-based learning in middle school mathematics: A review. Middle School Journal, 54(5), 16–26. https://doi.org/10.1080/00940771.2023.2254175
Sullivan, G. M., & Artino, A. R., Jr. (2013). Analyzing and interpreting data from Likert-type scales. Journal of Graduate Medical Education, 5(4), 541–542. https://doi.org/10.4300/JGME-5-4-18
Tavakol, M., & Dennick, R. (2011). Making sense of Cronbach’s alpha. International Journal of Medical Education, 2, 53–55. https://doi.org/10.5116/ijme.4dfb.8dfd
Wouters, P., van Nimwegen, C., van Oostendorp, H., & van der Spek, E. D. (2013). A meta-analysis of the cognitive and motivational effects of serious games. Journal of Educational Psychology, 105(2), 249–265. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0031311
Zamanzadeh, V., Ghahramanian, A., Rassouli, M., Abbaszadeh, A., Alavi-Majd, H., & Nikanfar, A.-R. (2015). Design and implementation content validity study: Development of an instrument for measuring patient-centered communication. Journal of Caring Sciences, 4(2), 165–178. https://doi.org/10.15171/jcs.2015.017
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Leonard Leonard, Galih Budi Prasetyo Suryo Nugroho (Author)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
