Evaluating Islamic-Integrated General Chemistry Course Using CIPP Model: A Comprehensive Assessment of Context, Input, Process, and Product at Islamic Higher Education
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.30998/d0b3f493Keywords:
Program evaluation; islamic integration; CIPP evaluation model, general chemistryAbstract
The integration of Islamic values into science education remains a critical challenge in Islamic higher education, particularly in General Chemistry courses where the disconnect between spiritual and scientific knowledge persists. Despite widespread recognition of the importance of integrating religious values with scientific learning, systematic evaluation of such integrated programs is limited. This study comprehensively evaluates an Islamic-integrated General Chemistry course program using the Context, Input, Process, and Product (CIPP) evaluation model to assess program alignment with institutional vision, quality of educational inputs, effectiveness of learning processes, and student learning outcomes. A mixed-methods approach was employed, combining document analysis, classroom observations, questionnaires, and interviews with 31 chemistry education students, one course lecturer, and the program head at a State Islamic University in Jakarta. Quantitative data were analyzed using descriptive statistics, while qualitative data underwent thematic analysis. Results indicate strong program alignment with institutional vision (100% compliance in context evaluation) and adequate student motivation (78% enthusiasm). However, significant challenges exist in learning resources (only 62% of students own reference books), interactive learning implementation, and conceptual mastery in kinetics and thermodynamics topics (average final exam score: 56.86). Holistic and integrative learning characteristics scored lowest in process evaluation, indicating insufficient student engagement and creativity development. The study provides evidence-based recommendations for improving Islamic-integrated chemistry education through enhanced teaching materials, diversified learning methods, improved integration quality between Islamic values and chemistry concepts, and strengthened input and process aspects. This research contributes to the theoretical understanding of science-religion integration in higher education and offers practical implications for developing more effective, meaningful, and holistic Islamic-integrated science programs.
Downloads
References
Alvianita, C., Tanti, T., & Hariyadi, B. (2022). Construction and Validation of Evaluation Instruments for Science Learning Programs Based on Context, Input, Process, and Product (CIPP) Models. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, 8(3), 1089–1095. https://doi.org/10.29303/jppipa.v8i3.1369
Ardi, Lufri, Amran, A., Kosasih, A., & Hervi, F. (2024). The effect of Islam and science integration implementing on science learning in Indonesia: a meta-analysis. International Journal of Evaluation and Research in Education , 13(4), 2594–2602. https://doi.org/10.11591/ijere.v13i4.27632
Aswie, V. (2023). Mengintegrasikan Karakter Religius Pada Pembelajaran Kimia Dalam Meningkatkan Pemahaman Materi Sistem Periodik Unsur. Jentre, 4(1), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.38075/jen.v4i1.322
Az-zahra, F. (2023). Integrasi Islam Dan Sains Serta Implikasinya Dalam Teknologi Pendidikan. Prosiding Konferensi Integrasi Interkoneksi Islam Dan Sains, 5, 86–88.
Bhakti, B. Y. (2017). Evaluasi Program Model CIPP Pada Proses. Jurnal Inovasi Pendidikan Fisika Dan Riset Ilmiah, 1(2), 75–82.
Casey, J. R., Supriya, K., Shaked, S., Caram, J. R., Russell, A., & Courey, A. J. (2023). Participation in a High-Structure General Chemistry Course Increases Student Sense of Belonging and Persistence to Organic Chemistry. Journal of Chemical Education, 100(8), 2860–2872. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jchemed.2c01253
Creswell, J. W., & Clarck, V. L. P. (2018). Designing & Conducting Mixed Methods Research. In Sage (Third). Sage.
Dalimunthe, U. (2022). Integrasi Ilmu – Ilmu Agama Islam dengan Ilmu – Ilmu Umum. Book Chapter of Proceedings Journey-Liaison Academia and Society, 1(1), 809–820. https://www.j-las.lemkomindo.org/index.php/BCoPJ-LAS/article/view/86
Fitriyawany, F., Lailatussaadah, L., & Meutiawati, I. (2022). Integrating Islamic Values into Science Learning in Indonesian Islamic Higher Education: Expectation and Implementation. Tadris: Jurnal Keguruan Dan Ilmu Tarbiyah, 7(1), 119–132. https://doi.org/10.24042/tadris.v7i1.10802
Fitzpatrick, J. L., Sanders, J. R., & Worthen, B. R. (2011). Program Evaluation Alternative Approaches and Practical Guidelines (Fourth). Pearson.
Hartati, S. J., Sayidah, N., & Muhajir. (2018). The use of CIPP model for evaluation of computational algorithm learning program. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1088. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1088/1/012081
Hasja, N. F. B., Rahman, S., & L, H. (2023). Peningkatan Partisipasi Aktif Siswa dalam Pembelajaran IPA dengan Menggunakan Metode Collaborative Learning. Jurnal Pemikiran Dan Pengembangan Pembelajara, 5(3), 667–675.
Henukh, A., Nahadi, N., Sriyati, S., & Ekasari, A. (2024). Evaluasi Program Perkuliahan Fisika Lingkungan Berbasis Etnosains Menggunakan Model CIPP. Jurnal Pendidikan Mipa, 14(2), 532–541. https://doi.org/10.37630/jpm.v14i2.1576
Ichsan, Santosa, T. A., Ilwandri, Sofianora, A., & Yastanti, U. (2023). Efektivitas Evaluasi Model CIPP Dalam Pembelajaran IPA di Indonesia : Meta-Analisis. Jurnal Pendidikan Dan Konseling, 5(2), 2423–2430.
Ijirana, Aminah, S., Supriadi, & Magfirah. (2022). Critical Thinking Skills of Chemistry Education Students in Team Project-Based Stem-Metacognitive Skills Learning During the Covid-19 Pandemic. Journal of Technology and Science Education, 12(2), 397–409. https://doi.org/10.3926/jotse.1697
Irvani, A. I., Rochintaniawati, D., Riandi, R., Sinaga, P., & Henukh, A. (2024). Analysis of Quantum Physics Lectures from the Perspective of the MBKM and OBE Based Higher Education Curriculum. Jurnal Pendidikan Fisika Dan Teknologi, 10(1), 44–54. https://doi.org/10.29303/jpft.v10i1.6390
Lei, Z. (2024). The Application of CIPP Model in the Evaluation of Teaching Quality of College Education in the Context of New Era. Applied Mathematics and Nonlinear Sciences, 9(1), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.2478/amns.2023.2.01568
Liu, Y., & Liu, Y. (2024). Analysis of Influencing Factors on the Teaching Reform Quality of Visual Communication Design Courses in Colleges and Universities Combined with Entropy Weighted TOPSIS Modeling. Applied Mathematics and Nonlinear Sciences, 9(1), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.2478/amns-2024-0696
Megasari, D. S., Kusstianti, N., Dwiyanti, S., Usodoningtyas, S., & Puspitorini, A. (2022). Tracer Study Analysis in Cosmetology Study Program Depending on Graduate Users’ Demands. 1–10. https://doi.org/10.4108/eai.6-10-2022.2325716
Mufarrohah, S., Munir, A., & Anam, S. (2022). Authentic Materials of Choice among English Lecturers. Linguistic, English Education and Art (LEEA) Journal, 5(2), 162–174. https://doi.org/10.31539/leea.v5i2.1280
Nasir, A. H. (2022). Integration of Science and Religious Sciences Its Implications for Islamic Religious Education. International Conference on Islamic …, 118–127. https://proceeding.uingusdur.ac.id/index.php/icis/article/view/880%0Ahttps://proceeding.uingusdur.ac.id/index.php/icis/article/download/880/373
Norazmi, A., Zaki, A., Hudzari, M., Subki, R. N., & Bakar, N. A. A. (2013). The Integration Of Knowledge In Islam:, Concept And Challenge. Global Journal of HUMAN SOCIAL SCIENCE Linguistics & Education, 13(10), 7. https://doi.org/10.46313/1707-000-040-026
Sagin, A., Balmer, D., Rose, S., Musheno, R., Olenik, J. M., Dingfield, L., Dine, C. J., & Bennett, N. L. (2024). Evaluation of a Palliative Care Longitudinal Curriculum for Medical Students Using the Context-Input-Process-Product Model. American Journal of Hospice and Palliative Medicine, 41(2), 158–166. https://doi.org/10.1177/10499091231165504
Saputro, A. N. C., Aznam, N., & Partana, C. F. (2022). Integration Method of Religious Character Values in Chemistry Learning. JKPK (Jurnal Kimia Dan Pendidikan Kimia), 7(1), 111. https://doi.org/10.20961/jkpk.v7i1.55601
Silviariza, W. Y., Sumarmi, Utaya, S., Bachri, S., & Handoyo, B. (2023). Development of Evaluation Instruments to Measure the Quality of Spatial Problem Based Learning (SPBL): CIPP Framework. International Journal of Instruction, 16(2), 413–436. https://doi.org/10.29333/iji.2023.16223a
Stufflebeam, D. L. (2003). The CIPP Model for Evaluation. International Handbook of Educational Evaluation, 31–62. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-010-0309-4_4
Suciati, R., Gofur, A., Susilo, H., & Lestari, U. (2022). Development of Textbook Integrated of Metacognition, Critical Thinking, Islamic Values, and Character. Pegem Egitim ve Ogretim Dergisi, 12(4), 20–28. https://doi.org/10.47750/pegegog.12.04.03
Sugiharti, G., Hamid, A., & Mukhtar, M. (2019). The implementation of learning model and virtual lab toward learning outcome of chemistry education. Jurnal Pendidikan Kimia, 11(3), 79–86. https://doi.org/10.24114/jpkim.v11i3.15734
Sumarsono, R. B., Gunawan, I., Kusumaningrum, D. E., Benty, D. D. N., & Bhayangkara, A. N. (2021). Influence of Lecturer’s Pedagogic Competency Level, Quality of Administrative Services, Completeness of Lecture Supporting Facilities, and Student Satisfaction on Learning Motivation. Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan, 27(1), 23. https://doi.org/10.17977/um048v27i1p23-33
Turgut, H. (2016). Pre-service Science Teachers’ Perceptions About Relationship Between Religion And Science İn The Context Of Their Worldviews. International Online Journal of Educational Sciences, 8(3). https://doi.org/10.15345/iojes.2016.03.014
Tursinawati, T., Fitriani, S., Safiah, I., Widodo, A., Sopandi, W., & Amiruddin, M. H. (2024). The Integration of the Nature of Science and Religion to Increase Students’ Religious Beliefs in Acquiring Scientific Knowledge at the Elementary School. Jurnal Prima Edukasia, 12(1), 140–155. https://doi.org/10.21831/jpe.v12i1.67649
Umam, K. A., & Saripah, I. (2018). Using the Context, Input, Process and Product (CIPP) Model in the Evaluation of Training Programs. International Journal of Pedagogy and Teacher Education, 2(July), 19. https://doi.org/10.20961/ijpte.v2i0.26086
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Andhika Baruri, Nahadi Nahadi, Siti Sriyati, Eka Cahya Prima, Fitri Khoerunnisa, Oktariani Oktariani, Febrian Virijai (Author)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
