Comparative Study of the Transformation of JNM Bloc Yogyakarta and Blok M Jakarta Through a Creative Placemaking Approach

Maritza Khayyarah Alimah; Stefy Prasasti Anggraini; Adilah Nur Khairunnisa

doi:10.30998/enmnt127

Authors

Maritza Khayyarah Alimah Author
Stefy Prasasti Anggraini Islamic University of Indonesia Author
Adilah Nur Khairunnisa Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.30998/enmnt127

Keywords:

Comparative study, Creative placemaking, Creative public space, Place attachment, Urban vitality

Abstract

Urban revitalization through a creative placemaking approach has become an important strategy in reactivating public spaces that have experienced functional and social decline. JNM Bloc Yogyakarta and Blok M Jakarta represent two transformations of former urban areas into creative public spaces with distinct spatial and social dynamics. Previous studies have generally examined these areas separately, focusing on aspects such as adaptive reuse, urban regeneration, or their role as youth gathering spaces. However, comparative research that analyzes spatial characteristics, activity patterns, and user experiences within the framework of creative placemaking remains limited. This study aims to compare the spatial character, activity patterns, and user experiences of both areas in shaping place identity and urban vitality. The research employs a qualitative descriptive approach using a comparative case study method through field observations, visual documentation, and semi-structured interviews. The findings indicate that JNM Bloc emphasizes historical continuity and community-based artistic activities, creating an intimate and curated spatial atmosphere. In contrast, Blok M demonstrates dense urban dynamics characterized by diverse culinary, entertainment, and nightlife activities. These findings confirm that historical context, activity intensity, and spatial connectivity play significant roles in shaping place identity and the experience of creative public spaces. This study contributes to expanding comparative discussions on creative public spaces in different urban contexts.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

Maritza Khayyarah Alimah

Maritza is a student from department of architecture, Universitas Islam Indonesia.

References

[1] Project for Public Spaces, “What Makes a Successful Place,” Public for Public Spaces. Accessed: Jan. 23, 2026. [Online]. Available: https://www.pps.org/article/grplacefeat

[2] M. Carmona, “Principles for public space design, planning to do better,” Urban Design International, vol. 24, no. 1, pp. 47–59, Mar. 2019, doi: 10.1057/s41289-018-0070-3.

[3] Fernando Randy, “Blok M Mal Dulu Hiruk Pikuk Kini Mati Suri,” Historia.id. Accessed: Jan. 23, 2026. [Online]. Available: https://www.historia.id/article/blok-m-mal-dulu-hiruk-pikuk-kini-mati-suri-daznx

[4] The Jakarta Post, “Blok M to become Jakarta’s Economic Hub that ‘never sleeps,’” The Jakarta Post. Accessed: Jan. 23, 2026. [Online]. Available: https://www.thejakartapost.com/indonesia/2025/05/26/blok-m-to-become-jakartas-economic-hub-that-never-sleeps.html

[5] R. Bagus et al., “Revealing the Spirit of Place: The Former Campus of the Indonesian Academy of Fine Arts in Yogyakarta,” 2025.

[6] M. Gavriel and R. Surya, “Mengembalikan Popularitas Blok M Sebagai Area Berkumpul Pemuda Jakarta Melalui Menggunakan Metode Penyuntikan Urban Acupuncture,” Jurnal Sains, Teknologi, Urban, Perancangan, Arsitektur (Stupa), vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 2181–2196, Jan. 2023, doi: 10.24912/stupa.v4i2.22134.

[7] J. Jacobs, “The Death And Life Of Great American Cities.

[8] Project for Public Spaces, “What is Placemaking?,” Project for Public Spaces. Accessed: Jan. 23, 2026. [Online]. Available: https://www.pps.org/article/what-is-placemaking

[9] W. Soedarsono, E. Y. Astuti, A. U. Paramitasari, N. Asriana, D. Putri, and A. Zahra, “Placemaking in the Digital Era: A Case Study of M Bloc Space-Jakarta,” 2021.

[10] R. Oldenburg, “The Great Good Place: Cafés, Coffee Shops, Bookstores, Bars, Hair Salons, and Other Hangouts at the Heart of a Community. Marlowe & Company.,” 1999. [Online]. Available: https://archive.org/detaiis/greatgoodpiaceca00oide_2

11] C. Y. Yu, “Access to Third Places: Key Determinants of Physical and Social Well-Being in Older Adults,” Urban Science, vol. 9, no. 5, May 2025, doi: 10.3390/urbansci9050141.

[12] D. Seamon and J. Sowers, “Place and Placelessness, Edward Relph.”

[13] L. Scannell and R. Gifford, “Defining place attachment: A tripartite organizing framework,” J. Environ. Psychol., vol. 30, no. 1, pp. 1–10, Mar. 2010, doi: 10.1016/j.jenvp.2009.09.006.

[14] M. R. Saputra and A. W. Purwantiasning, “Kajian Adaptive Reuse Pada Kedai Seni Djakarte, Kota Tua Jakarta Kajian Adaptive Reuse Pada Bangunan Di Kota Tua Jakarta.”

[15] S. B. Lim, N. Wildaniah, S. M. Razib, I. Mukhlis, N. ’ Asah Nasrudin, and I. Fitri, “Urban Regeneration And Public Space: Lessons On Early Intervention Of Community-Based Micro-Planning,” 2024.

[16] S. E. Prasetyo, S. F. A. P. Sahono, Y. L. Purba, and Y. P. Halawa, “Sense of Place pada Kawasan Masjid Tua di Pekojan Jakarta untuk Landasan Revitalisasi Kawasan,” Jurnal Arsitektur Wastu Padma, vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 074–084, Dec. 2023, doi: 10.62024/jawp.v1i2.8.

[17] G. R. Adhiarza, “Revitalisasi Kawasan Bersejarah Kantor Pos Lama Pontianak Sebagai Daya Tarik Wisata Kota: Kajian Persepsi, Potensi Dan Strategi Pengelolaan,” Journal of Architectural Design and Development, vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 113–124, Jun. 2025, doi: 10.37253/jad.v6i1.10583.

[18] I. Rakonjac, A. Zorić, I. Rakonjac, J. Milošević, J. Marić, and D. Furundžić, “Increasing the Livability of Open Public Spaces during Nighttime: The Importance of Lighting in Waterfront Areas,” Sustainability (Switzerland), vol. 14, no. 10, May 2022, doi: 10.3390/su14106058.

[19] J. Qi, S. Mazumdar, and A. C. Vasconcelos, “Understanding the Relationship between Urban Public Space and Social Cohesion: A Systematic Review,” International Journal of Community Well-Being, vol. 7, no. 2, pp. 155–212, Jun. 2024, doi: 10.1007/s42413-024-00204-5.

[20] A. Seijas and M. M. Gelders, “Governing the night-time city: The rise of night mayors as a new form of urban governance after dark,” Urban Studies, vol. 58, no. 2, pp. 316–334, Feb. 2021, doi: 10.1177/0042098019895224.

[21] S. Tang and N. Ta, “How the built environment affects the spatiotemporal pattern of urban vitality: A comparison among different urban functional areas,” Computational Urban Science, vol. 2, no. 1, Dec. 2022, doi: 10.1007/s43762-022-00069-4.

[22] F. A. Hakim, “Open space as urban space structure, case study park area in Depok Jaya urban village, Depok,” Lakar: Jurnal Arsitektur, vol. 8, no. 1, 2025.

[23] R. Rejoni, A. Kusumoarto, and E. Kristiana, “Konsep penataan ruang publik area gapura Kelurahan Curug Kota Bogor,” Lakar: Jurnal Arsitektur, vol. 6, no. 1, 2023.