Identifying Walkability In Relation to Accessibility and Inclusivity of Public Spaces at Titik 0 Malioboro Yogyakarta

Lingga Eka Vedayana; Stefy Prasasti Anggraini; Adilah Nur Khairunnisa

doi:10.30998/n1h5mg92

Authors

Lingga Eka Vedayana Author
Stefy Prasasti Anggraini Islamic University of Indonesia Author
Adilah Nur Khairunnisa Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.30998/n1h5mg92

Keywords:

Accessibility, Inclusivity, Public Space, Titik 0 Malioboro, Walkability

Abstract

Titik 0 Malioboro area in Yogyakarta is a central public space with high levels of social, economic, and cultural activity, especially in the afternoon and evening. These conditions make the quality of pedestrian paths and the walking experience (walkability) important aspects in supporting the function of a safe, comfortable, and inclusive public space. This study aims to evaluate walkability in the Titik 0 Malioboro area within a radius of ±300 meters, focusing on accessibility and inclusivity for all user groups. The study uses a qualitative approach with a case study method through field observations, visual documentation, and semi-structured interviews conducted in the afternoon to evening hours. Data analysis is conducted descriptively and analytically with reference to the concepts of walkability, inclusive public space theory, and urban vitality theory. The results show that structurally, this area has a relatively connected network of pedestrian paths that supports pedestrian mobility. However, at the user experience level, the quality of walkability is not yet fully optimal due to activity density, space conflicts, and limitations and inconsistencies in universal accessibility facilities. This study emphasizes the need for an integrative approach through physical improvements to pedestrian paths, activity management, and the application of universal design principles to create inclusive and sustainable public spaces.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

Lingga Eka Vedayana

Lingga is a student from department of architecture, Universitas Islam Indonesia.

References

[1] ANTARA News, “Pemkot Yogyakarta selenggarakan Malioboro Culture Vibes wujudkan Malioboro inklusif.” Accessed: Des. 23, 2026. [Online]. Available: https://jogja.antaranews.com/berita/786513/pemkot-yogyakarta-selenggarakan-malioboro-culture-vibes-wujudkan-malioboro-inklusif

[2] J. Speck, “Walkable City: How Downtown Can Save America, One Step at a Time.” New York, NY, USA: Farrar, Straus and Giroux, 2012.

[3] Stephen. Carr, Mark. Francis, L. G. . Rivlin, and A. M. . Stone, Public Space. Cambridge University Press, 20091992.

[4] J. Jacobs, “THE DEATH AND LIFE OF GREAT AMERICAN CITIES.” New York, NY, USA: Random House, 1961.

[5] H. N. Rahmah, J. Rahayu, and E. F. Rini, “Tingkat Pelayanan Jalur Pedestrian di Kawasan Wisata Malioboro, Kota Yogyakarta The Service Level of Pedestrian Paths in Malioboro Tourism Area, Yogyakarta City,” vol. 7, no. 2, pp. 102–111, 2025, doi: 10.20961/desa-kota.v7i2.91086.102-111.

[6] Natalia Tanan, Sony S. Wibowo, and Nuryani Tinumbia, “PENGUKURAN WALKABILITY INDEX PADA RUAS JALAN DI KAWASAN PERKOTAAN,” 2017.

[7] J. Gehl, “LIFE BETWEEN BUILDINGS.” Washington, DC, USA: Island Press, 2011.

[8] William H. Whyte, “WHYTE”. New York, NY, USA: Project for Public Spaces, 1980.

[9] Project for Public Spaces, “What is Placemaking?,” Project for Public Spaces. Accessed: Des. 23, 2026. [Online]. Available: https://www.pps.org/article/what-is-placemaking.

[10] M. Carmona, “Principles for Public Space design, planning to do better,” Urban Design International, vol. 24, no. 1, pp. 47–59, Mar. 2019, doi: 10.1057/s41289-018-0070-3.

[11] R. Hrelja, L. Olsson, F. Pettersson-Löfstedt, and T. Rye, TRANSIT ORIENTED DEVELOPMENT (TOD) A Literature Review, 2020.

[12] Y. Hadas, D. E. Katz, and J. Rabinowitz, “Integrating more walking into public transit commuting: a proof-of-concept study,” BMC Public Health, vol. 25, no. 1, Dec. 2025, doi: 10.1186/s12889-025-25010-2.

[13] I. Rakonjac, A. Zorić, I. Rakonjac, J. Milošević, J. Marić, and D. Furundžić, “Increasing the Livability of Open Public Spaces during Nighttime: The Importance of Lighting in Waterfront Areas,” Sustainability (Switzerland), vol. 14, no. 10, May 2022, doi: 10.3390/su14106058.

[14] S. A. Kim and H. Kim, “Structural Relationship between COVID-19, Night-Time Economic Vitality, and Credit-Card Sales: The Application of a Formative Measurement Model in PLS-SEM,” Buildings, vol. 12, no. 10, Oct. 2022, doi: 10.3390/buildings12101606.

[15] P. Voltolini, “STREET VENDING AND THE USE OF PUBLIC SPACES IN NEW YORK CITY,” 2006.

[16] A. Patil, D. Pojani, I. Mateo-Babiano, and T. Amani, “Interactions Between Pedestrians and Street Vendors: Experiences From the Global North and South,” Urban Plan., vol. 10, 2025, doi: 10.17645/up.8910.

[17] A. Gupta, M. Yadav, and B. K. Nayak, “A Systematic Literature Review on Inclusive Public Open Spaces: Accessibility Standards and Universal Design Principles,” Jun. 01, 2025, Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute (MDPI). doi: 10.3390/urbansci9060181.

[18] T. E. Martínez-Chao, A. Menéndez-Díaz, S. García-Cortés, and P. D’Agostino, “Urban Pedestrian Routes’ Accessibility Assessment Using Geographic Information System Processing and Deep Learning-Based Object Detection,” Sensors, vol. 24, no. 11, Jun. 2024, doi: 10.3390/s24113667.