ANALYSIS OF REGIONAL ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AND SMART CITY COMPETITIVENESS IN INDONESIA
DIGITAL INFRASTRUCTURE DEVELOPMENT AND REGIONAL LABOR PRODUCTIVITY IN INDONESIA: TESTING THE IT INVESTMENT PARADOX
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.30998/jabe.v12i4.4305Keywords:
Digital Infrastructure, Economic Growth, IT Investment Paradox, Labor Productivity, Panel Data, Smart CityAbstract
This study evaluates the structural friction between digital infrastructure expansion and regional economic efficiency across Indonesian provinces from 2020 to 2025. Using a quantitative-descriptive framework, panel data from 34 provinces are analyzed with the Fixed Effects Model to test for the Information Technology investment paradox at the subnational level. The empirical investigation reveals a critical divergence: while digital infrastructure significantly boosts Gross Regional Domestic Product, it has a strong negative impact on labor productivity in regions with low technological readiness. This theoretical anomaly uncovers a profound digital skills mismatch driven by skill-biased technological change and premature industrial automation. Furthermore, the global competitiveness of major Indonesian cities remains stagnant in the 2025 IMD Smart City Index due to highly fragmented data ecosystems and a lack of integrated subnational data governance. This study contributes to the literature by reconciling the inconsistent macroeconomic impacts of information technology. It concludes that local smart city master plans must be structurally unified with national human capital frameworks to mitigate labor displacement and foster inclusive regional growth.
Downloads
References
Adel, A., & Alani, N. H. S. (2024). Human-centric collaboration and Industry 5.0 framework in smart cities and communities: Fostering sustainable development goals 3, 4, 9, and 11 in Society 5.0. Smart Cities, 7(4), 1723–1775. https://doi.org/10.3390/smartcities7040068
Adeleke, O. J., Jovanovich, K. D., Ogunbunmi, S., Samuel, O., & Kehinde, T. O. (2025). Comprehensive Exploration of Smart Cities : A Systematic Review of Benefits , Challenges , and Future Directions in Telecommunications and Urban Development. IEEE Sensors Reviews, 2(June), 228–245. https://doi.org/10.1109/SR.2025.3569239
Agustin, R. A., & Sakti, R. K. (2025). Analysis Of Economic Growth and Income Inequality Among Province in Indonesia 2018–2022. Journal of Development Economic and Social Studies, 4(1), 238–252. https://doi.org/10.21776/jdess.2025.04.1.18
Ahmed, E. M. (2017). ICT and human capital spillover effects in achieving sustainable East Asian knowledge-based economies. Journal of the Knowledge Economy, 8(3), 1086–1112. Https://doi.org/10.1007/s13132-016-0430-4
Chukwuemeka, O. A. (2024). A Theoretical and Empirical Literature on Economic Growth. Advanced Research in Economics and Business Strategy Journal, 05(02), 7–16. https://asjp.cerist.dz/en/article/262828
Elmassah, S., & Mohieldin, M. (2020). Digital transformation and localizing the sustainable development goals (SDGs). Ecological Economics, 171(February), 106604. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2020.106604
Herlina, & Subiyantoro, H. (2024). Analisis pengaruh pendidikan tinggi, pengeluaran pemerintah sektor pendidikan, keberadaan perguruan tinggi terhadap pertumbuhan ekonomi serta implikasinya terhadap Indeks Pembangunan Manusia. Journal of Applied Business and Economic (JABE), 11(1), 86–99. https://doi.org/10.30998/jabe.v11i1.24489
IMD World Competitiveness Center. (2025). IMD Smart City Index 2025. https://www.imd.org/smart-city-index/
Kartiasih, F., Nachrowi, N. D., Wisana, I. D. G. ., & Handayani, D. (2023). Towards the quest to reduce income inequality in Indonesia: Is there a synergy between ICT and the informal sector? Cogent Economics & Finance, 11(2), 2241771. https://doi.org/10.1080/23322039.2023.2241771
Krabokoukis, T., Tsiotas, D., & Kantianis, D. (2026). Mapping The Spatial Dynamics Of Innovation-Driven Socioeconomic Inequality In The European Union. Romanian Journal of Regional Science, 20(1), 1–28. https://econpapers.repec.org/article/rrsjournl/v_3a20_3ay_3a2026_3ai_3a1_3ap_3a1-28.htm
Liando, D. M., Ganaie, N. A., & Yuslaini, N. (2026). Smart City 2 . 0 governance policy model : institutional configurations and the politics of urban inclusion in India , Singapore , and Indonesia. Frontiers in Political Science, 8(February), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpos.2026.1730870
Lucas, R. E. (1988). On the mechanics of economic development. Journal of Monetary Economics, 22(1), 3–42. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-3932(88)90168-7
Novitasari, A. T. (2022). Kontribusi UMKM terhadap pertumbuhan ekonomi era digitalisasi melalui peran pemerintah. Journal of Applied Business and Economic (JABE), 9(2), 184–204. https://doi.org/10.30998/jabe.v9i2.13703
Polese, F., Botti, A., Monda, A., & Grimaldi, M. (2019). Smart city as a service system: a framework to improve smart service management. Journal of Service Science and Management, 12(1), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.4236/jssm.2019.121001
Privara, A., & Caplanova, A. (2025). Institutions , digital investment potential and productivity growth in EU and Southeast Asia. The Journal of Risk Finance, 26(5), 722–744. https://doi.org/10.1108/JRF-04-2025-0180
Putra, D. S., Putra, F., & Subekti, D. (2026). A Multidimensional Analysis : Gaps and Convergence Smart City Implementation in Indonesia. Jurnal Ilmu Sosial Dan Humaniora, 15(1), 192–206. https://doaj.org/article/04ce438b4625419691033ce9bef7ae07
Romer, P. . (1986). Increasing returns and long-run growth. Journal of Political Economy, 94(5), 1002–1037. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1086/261420
Seeth, A. T., & Suryomenggolo, J. (2022). Politics of marginalisation in Indonesia: The Jokowi era. IQAS – International Quarterly for Asian Studies, 53(2), 137–153. https://doi.org/10.11588/iqas.2022.2.19323](https://doi.org/10.11588/iqas.2022.2.19323
Sen, A. (1999). Development as freedom. Oxford University Press.
Sulistyaningsih, T., Purnama, R. A., & Kulsum, U. (2023). Smart city policy: Strategy and implementation to realize smart urban governance in Indonesia. Journal of Governance and Public Policy, 10(2), 105–117. https://doi.org/10.18196/jgpp.v10i2.17637
Willcocks, L. P. (2024). Automation, digitalization and the future of work: A critical review. Journal of Electronic Business & Digital Economics, 3(2), 184–199. https://doi.org/10.1108/JEBDE-09-2023-0018
Yeo, B., & Grant, D. (2024). The technology paradox explained in stages and technology presence. International Journal of Business and Economics, 23(1), 87–112. https://doi.org/10.6758/ijbe.202404_23(1).0005.
Zeng, W., Wu, X., Zhu, K., & Zhu, L. (2025). Can Digitization Policy Improve Capital Misallocation in China ? Empirical Evidence Based on National Big Data Comprehensive Pilot Zone Policy. SAGE Open, 15(3), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440251356790
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Selly Kudrati Ningsih, Firsty Ramadhona Amalia Lubis, Lestari Sukarniati, Yunizarrahman, Muhammad Farhan

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.






