GEOPOLITICAL ENERGY SHOCKS, RESIN PRICES DYNAMICS, AND INDUSTRIAL IMPLICATIONS IN EAST AND SOUTHEAST ASIA: AN ECONOMETRIC AND POLICY ANALYSIS TO 2030
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.30998/c23dq735Keywords:
ASEAN Economies, Energy Price Shocks, Geopolitical Risk, Petrochemical Industry, Price Transmission, Resin Market, VAR-GARCHAbstract
ABSTRACT
This study investigates the impact of geopolitical energy shocks on resin price dynamics in East and Southeast Asia and explores their implications through 2030. Escalating conflicts in the Middle East, particularly involving Iran, have increased volatility in global energy markets, disrupted petrochemical supply chains, and raised production costs for resin products. Because many Asian economies rely heavily on imported energy and petrochemical feedstocks, they are especially vulnerable to such disruptions. Using a hybrid methodology, the study combines econometric analysis and policy assessment. Monthly data from 2015–2026 are analyzed using Vector Autoregression (VAR) and GARCH models to examine price transmission and volatility spillovers from crude oil and naphtha to resin markets, including C5/C9 and epoxy resins. A geopolitical shock index is incorporated to measure the effects of conflict-related disruptions. The findings reveal a strong and asymmetric transmission of energy price increases to resin prices, with volatility intensifying during periods of geopolitical instability. Forecasts to 2030 indicate that continued disruptions in major energy transit routes could raise resin prices by 15–35% above baseline projections, creating substantial challenges for ASEAN manufacturing industries. The study highlights the need for policies that reduce feedstock dependence, diversify supply chains, and strengthen industrial resilience. By integrating energy economics and supply chain analysis, it provides empirical evidence and practical policy recommendations to support industrial competitiveness and energy security in emerging Asian economies.
Downloads
References
Al-Haddad, A., & Abu-Rayash, A. (2026). Volatility modeling in energy commodity markets: A review of responses to shocks and the path towards resiliency and sustainability. Applied Energy, 411. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.APENERGY.2026.127559
Asche, F., Gjølberg, O., & Völker, T. (2003). Price relationships in the petroleum market: an analysis of crude oil and refined product prices. Energy Economics, 25(3), 289–301. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-9883(02)00110-X
Baiardi, D. (2020). Do sustainable energy policies matter for reducing air pollution? Energy Policy, 140, 111364. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.ENPOL.2020.111364
Bollerslev, T. (1986). Generalized autoregressive conditional heteroskedasticity. Journal of Econometrics, 31(3), 307–327. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-4076(86)90063-1
Broadstock, D. C., Cao, H., & Zhang, D. (2012). Oil shocks and their impact on energy related stocks in China. Energy Economics, 34(6), 1888–1895. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.ENECO.2012.08.008
Caldara, D., & Iacoviell, M. (2022). Measuring Geopolitical Risk. American Economic Review, 112(4), 1194–1225. https://doi.org/10.1257/AER.20191823
Choi, S., Furceri, D., Loungani, P., Mishra, S., Ribeiro, M. P., Choi, S., Furceri, D., Loungani, M. P., Mishra, M. S., & Ribeiro, M. M. P. (2017). Oil Prices and Inflation Dynamics: Evidence from Advanced and Developing Economies1. In IMF Working Papers (WP/17/196; Issue 196). International Monetary Fund. https://doi.org/10.5089/9781484316658.001.A001
Cunado, J., Jo, S., & Perez de Gracia, F. (2015). Macroeconomic impacts of oil price shocks in Asian economies. Energy Policy, 86, 867–879. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2015.05.004
Gong, X., & Xu, J. (2021). Geopolitical Risk and Dynamic Connectedness between Commodity Markets. SSRN Electronic Journal. https://doi.org/10.2139/SSRN.3971707
Gong, X., & Xu, J. (2022). Geopolitical risk and dynamic connectedness between commodity markets. Energy Economics, 110. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2022.106028
Hamilton, J. D. (2003). What is an oil shock? Journal of Econometrics, 113(2), 363–398. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0304-4076(02)00207-5
Hasanov, E., & Hasanov, M. (2018). Analysing the relationship between oil prices and basic petrochemical feedstocks. Energy Economy, Finance and Geostrategy, 113–131. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-76867-0_6/TABLES/8
Huang, J., Ding, Q., Zhang, H., Guo, Y., & Suleman, M. T. (2021). Nonlinear dynamic correlation between geopolitical risk and oil prices: A study based on high-frequency data. Research in International Business and Finance, 56, 101370. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.RIBAF.2020.101370
Ji, Q., & Fan, Y. (2012). How does oil price volatility affect non-energy commodity markets? Applied Energy, 89(1), 273–280. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.APENERGY.2011.07.038
Kilian, L. (2009). Not all oil price shocks are alike: Disentangling demand and supply shocks in the crude oil market. American Economic Review, 99(3), 1053–1069. https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.99.3.1053
Li, M., & Patiño-Echeverri, D. (2017). Estimating benefits and costs of policies proposed in the 13th FYP to improve energy efficiency and reduce air emissions of China’s electric power sector. Energy Policy, 111, 222–234. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.ENPOL.2017.09.011
Yang, J., Feng, Y., & Yang, H. (2024). Commodity connectedness of the petrochemical industrial chain: A novel perspective of “good” and “bad” volatility surprises. Finance Research Letters, 67, 105894. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.FRL.2024.105894
Zhen, W., Qin, Q., & Miao, L. (2023). The greenhouse gas rebound effect from increased energy efficiency across China’s staple crops. Energy Policy, 173, 113398. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.ENPOL.2022.113398
Zheng, D., Zhao, C., & Hu, J. (2023). Impact of geopolitical risk on the volatility of natural resource commodity futures prices in China. Resources Policy, 83. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resourpol.2023.103568
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Ferry Noldy Langelo, Citra Aprilia

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.






