Contemporary Methods of Indonesian Research in Improving Students Writing Skills Through Extensive Reading Method

Muhammad Aldino Putra Difa; Nur Mukminatien; Francisca Maria Ivone

doi:10.30998/qjhtvg89

Authors

Muhammad Aldino Putra Difa State University of Malang Author
Nur Mukminatien State University of Malang Author
Francisca Maria Ivone State University of Malang Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.30998/qjhtvg89

Keywords:

Extensive Reading, Writing Skills, Indonesian EFL Learners, Writing Performance, Secondary Data Analysis

Abstract

Extensive Reading (ER) has been widely recognized as an effective approach for improving English as Foreign Language (EFL) students’ writing skills. However, variations in ER implementation and contextual factors have produced differing findings, particularly in Indonesian EFL settings. This study aims to examine contemporary Indonesian research on the use of ER in enhancing students’ writing skills and to identify the outcomes, differences, and challenges across studies. The study employed a Secondary Data Analysis design using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) framework to collect and analyze relevant studies. Five experimental studies conducted in Indonesian contexts were selected and compared based on ER implementation, writing assessment subscales, descriptive statistics, and effect sizes. The findings showed that ER generally contributed positively to students’ writing performance, with treatment groups outperforming control groups in most studies. The greatest improvements were found in content and language use, indicating that ER supports idea development and grammatical competence through continuous exposure to meaningful reading materials. Effect size analysis also revealed medium to large impacts in several studies, confirming the pedagogical effectiveness of ER in Indonesian EFL classrooms. Nevertheless, one study reported non-significant results due to limited reading resources, low reading engagement, and insufficient literacy environments. Overall, ER is a promising approach for improving writing proficiency among Indonesian EFL students, although successful implementation requires adequate resources, sustained reading habits, and supportive instructional practices.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Adhitya, N., & Novita, J. (2021). Students’ responses towards self-selected reading in extensive reading class. JELA (Journal of English Language Teaching, Literature and Applied Linguistics), 3(2), 1–7. https://doi.org/10.37742/jela.v3i2.53

Anandari, C. L., & Iswandari, Y. A. (2019). Extensive reading in Indonesian schools: A successful story. TEFLIN Journal, 30(2). https://doi.org/10.15639/teflinjournal.v30i2/137-152

Atun, M., Adam, S., Siahaan, S., Marpaung, J., & Subrata, D. (2025). Improving reading and writing literacy skills through extensive reading in Tanjung Gundap. Anglo-Saxon: Jurnal Ilmiah Program Studi Pendidikan Bahasa Inggris, 16(1), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.33373/as.v16i1.7563

Bell, T. (2001). Extensive reading: Speed and comprehension. The Reading Matrix, 1(1).

Brown, C. M., & Hagoort, P. (2000). On the electrophysiology of language comprehension: Implications for the human language system. In Architectures and mechanisms for language processing (pp. 213–237). Cambridge University Press.

Diaz, S., & Laguado, J. C. (2013). Improving reading skills through skimming and scanning techniques at a public school: Action research. Opening Writing Doors Journal, 10(1), 133–150.

Epting, L. K., Gallena, E. M., Hicks, S. A., Palmer, E. N., & Weisberg, T. (2013). Read and think before you write: Prewriting time and level of print exposure as factors in writing and revision. Journal of Writing Research, 4(3), 239–259. https://doi.org/10.17239/jowr-2013.04.03.1

Fitriansyah, N., & Miftah, M. Z. (2020). Positive connection of extensive reading and writing fluency in EFL learning. LET: Linguistics, Literature and English Teaching Journal, 10(2), 44–70. https://doi.org/10.18592/let.v10i2.4137

Gavelek, J., & Bresnahan, P. (2014). Ways of meaning making: Sociocultural perspectives on reading comprehension. In Handbook of research on reading comprehension (pp. 164–200). Routledge.

Jacobs, H. L., Zinkgraf, S. A., Wormuth, D. R., Hartfield, V. F., & Hughey, J. B. (1981). Testing ESL composition: A practical approach. Newbury House.

Kargar Behbahani, H., Razmjoo, S. A., & YarAhmadi, M. (2025). Extensive reading and L2 vocabulary development: Exploring L2 learning experience through the L2 motivational self-system. Iranian Journal of Applied Language Studies, 17(2), 135–152.

Lee, S. Y., & Hsu, Y. Y. (2009). Determining the crucial characteristics of extensive reading programs: The impact of extensive reading on EFL writing. The International Journal of Foreign Language Teaching, 5(1), 12–20.

Lien, H. Y. (2010). EFL college learners’ perceptions of self-selected materials for extensive reading. English Teacher, 39(1), 194–204.

Linuwih, E. R. (2021). The effectiveness of extensive reading in improving EFL academic writing. Journal of English Language Teaching and Linguistics, 6(1), 167–177.

Marslen-Wilson, W. D., & Tyler, L. K. (2007). Morphology, language and the brain: The decompositional substrate for language comprehension. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 362(1481), 823–836.

Minnich, M., Kirkpatrick, A. J., Goodman, J. T., Whittaker, A., Stanton Chapple, H., Schoening, A. M., & Khanna, M. M. (2018). Writing across the curriculum: Reliability testing of a standardized rubric. Journal of Nursing Education, 57(6), 366–370.

Mol, S. E., & Bus, A. G. (2011). To read or not to read: A meta-analysis of print exposure from infancy to early adulthood. Psychological Bulletin, 137(2), 267–296. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0021890

Nugrahini, Y., & Rakhmawati, I. (2022). The effect of extensive reading on EFL learners’ writing performance. Jurnal Eduscience, 9(2), 515–531.

Permana, P. G. A. M., & Rohmah, Z. (2024). Contemporary translingual English language policy and practice in Indonesia. Cogent Education, 11(1), Article 2404059. https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2024

Poorsoti, S., & Asl, H. D. (2016). Effect of extensive reading on grammatical accuracy and fluency of EFL learners’ writing performance. Journal of Applied Linguistics and Language Research, 3(2), 188–201.

Renandya, W. A., & Jacobs, G. M. (2002). Extensive reading: Why aren’t we all doing it? In J. C. Richards & W. A. Renandya (Eds.), Methodology in language teaching: An anthology of current practice (pp. 295–302). Cambridge University Press.

Renandya, W. A., Hidayati, M., & Ivone, F. M. (2021). Extensive reading: Top ten implementation issues. JACET Journal, 65, 11–21.

Ria, T. N. (2016). The use of skimming to teach extensive reading. Jurnal Egaliter, 1(1).

Saddler, B., & Andrade, H. (2004). The writing rubric. Educational Leadership, 62(2), 48–52.

Sakurai, N. (2017). The relationship between the amount of extensive reading and the writing performance. The Reading Matrix: An International Online Journal, 17(2), 142–164.

Suk, N. (2017). The effects of extensive reading on reading comprehension, reading rate, and vocabulary acquisition. Reading Research Quarterly, 52(1), 73–89. https://doi.org/10.1002/rrq.152

Umar, S., Seken, K., & Artini, L. P. (2013). The effect of extensive reading and learning style on academic writing competency of semester five students of STKIP Hamzanwadi Selong. Jurnal Pendidikan Bahasa Inggris Indonesia, 1.

Wijaya, K. (2021). The important role of extensive reading strategy in Indonesian EFL learning contexts. Acuity: Journal of English Language Pedagogy, Literature and Culture, 6(2), 107–117.

Zwitserlood, P. (2018). Processing and representation of morphological complexity in native language comprehension and production. In The construction of words: Advances in construction morphology (pp. 583–602).