COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF DIRECT AND INDIRECT ILLOCUTIONARY ACTS IN COMMENCEMENT SPEECHES : A STUDY OF TAYLOR SWIFT (NYU 2022) AND MARIA RESSA (HARVARD 2024)

Ridhaswari Isnainingrum Fatihah; Rifari Baron; Nurjanah

doi:10.30998/9gx6kt11

Authors

Ridhaswari Isnainingrum Fatihah Universitas Indraprasta PGRI, Jakarta, Indonesia Author
Rifari Baron Universitas Indraprasta PGRI, Jakarta, Indonesia Author
Nurjanah Universitas Indraprasta PGRI, Jakarta, Indonesia Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.30998/9gx6kt11

Keywords:

illocutionary acts, pragmatics, speech analysis, communicative competence

Abstract

This study looks at how Taylor Swift and Maria Ressa use different types of speech acts in their commencement speeches at NYU (2022) and Harvard (2024). It focuses on five types: representatives, directives, commissives, expressives, and declaratives. Using a qualitative approach, the study explores how these speech acts are used directly or indirectly and how they shape the message and impact the audience. The results show that both speakers use different strategies to connect with their listeners, inspire them, and express personal or social values. This study also highlights how understanding speech acts can improve communication skills in English language learning, helping learners use language more effectively in real-life situations.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Bachman, L. F. (1990). Fundamental considerations in language testing. Oxford University Press.

Creswell, J. W. (2014). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative and mixed methods approaches (4th ed.). Sage Publications.

De La Rosa, V. M., & Lázaro, L. M. (2022). Legitimating meritocracy as part of the American Dream through the ritual of commencement speeches. Linguistics and Education, 72, 101117. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.linged.2022.101117

Jasim, M. T. (2023). Direct and indirect speech acts in court speeches. Journal of Namibian Studies: History Politics Culture.

Kasper, G., & Rose, K. R. (2002). Pragmatic development in a second language. Blackwell.

Nggawu, L. O., & Thao, N. T. P. (2023). The impact of Communicative Language Teaching (CLT) approach on students’ speaking ability in a public Indonesian university. Journal of Language and Education Research, 10(2), 45-60.

Richards, J. C., & Rodgers, T. S. (2001). Approaches and methods in language teaching (2nd ed.). Cambridge University Press.

Savignon, S. J. (2002). Interpreting Communicative Language Teaching. Yale University Press.

Yule, G. (1996). Pragmatics. Oxford University Press.

Yule, G. (2020). The study of language (6th ed.). Cambridge University Press.