NAVIGATING THE 21ST CENTURY: CRITICAL THINKING AND DIGITAL LITERACY IN INDONESIAN EFL TEXTBOOKS

Authors

  • Ria Triana Indraprasta Pgri University image/svg+xml Author
  • Supeno Author
  • Rina Husnaini Febriyanti Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.30998/90q4wv14

Keywords:

Critical Thinking Skills, Digital Literacy, Content Analysis

Abstract

This study examines critical thinking skills and digital literacy in two Indonesian EFL textbooks: English for Nusantara and Bright an English. Using a qualitative descriptive content analysis framed by the SOLO Taxonomy and Pegrum et al.’s digital literacy domains, the research evaluates cognitive levels and pedagogical implications for critical reading. Findings indicate that English for Nusantara heavily concentrates Higher-Order Thinking Skills (HOTS) in productive skills (writing ≈93%, speaking ≈83%) while maintaining Lower-Order Thinking Skills (LOTS) in receptive tasks. It demonstrates a strong, explicit approach to multimodal and critical/extended abstract literacy. Similarly, Bright an English favors HOTS in productive skills but remains dominated by LOTS in listening (≈9% HOTS). While both books support digital literacy, English for Nusantara shows greater alignment with extended abstract levels. The study recommends a pedagogical shift toward "text-to-context" bridging and increased HOTS integration in receptive skills to ensure balanced cognitive development in EFL classrooms.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Crystal, D. (2003). English as a global language (2nd ed.). Cambridge University Press.

Cunningsworth, A. (1995). Choosing your coursebook. Heinemann.

Fakhrillah, R. (2025). Evaluating hots and lots in ‘ English for Nusantara ’ : A content analysis of a grade VII English textbooks. 13(2), 515–532.

Graddol, D. (1997). The future of English? The British Council.

Kementrian Pendidikan, Kebudayaan, Riset, dan T. (2022). Peraturan Menteri Pendidikan, Kebudayaan, Riset, dan Teknologi Republik Indonesia nomor 22 tahun 2022 tentang standar mutu buku, standar proses dan kaidah pemerolehan naskah, serta standar proses dan kaidah penerbitan buku.

Kurikulum, P., Cholifatunisa, A., Aulia, L., Marlina, N., & Iskandar, S. (2025). Jurnal pedagogik pendidikan dasar pengembangan kurikulum merdeka dengan pendekatan deep learning dalam meningkatkan kompetensi siswa Sekolah Dasar. 128(1), 128–136.

Lestari, A. N. (2024). Analysis of English textbooks “Bright an English course for SMP/Mts Grade VII.”

McGrath, I. (2013). Teaching materials and the roles of EFL/ESL teachers: Practice and theory. Bloomsbury Academic.

Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1984). Qualitative data analysis: A sourcebook of new methods. SAGE Publications.

Pegrum, M., O’Rourke, R., & D’warte, J. (2018). Digital literacies. Springer.

Wiggins, G., & McTighe, J. (2005). Understanding by design (Expanded 2). ASCD (Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development).

William and Flora Hewlett Foundation. (2010). Education program strategic plan. The William and Flora Hewlett Foundation.

Yassin, A., & Bashir, A. (2024). Student satisfaction with the use of chat- GPT as a learning resource. Vocational: Journal of Educational Technology, 1(1), 1–7.

Yin, R. K. (2018). Case study research and applications: Design and methods (6th ed.). SAGE Publications.

Downloads

Published

2026-04-27

How to Cite

NAVIGATING THE 21ST CENTURY: CRITICAL THINKING AND DIGITAL LITERACY IN INDONESIAN EFL TEXTBOOKS. (2026). INFERENCE: Journal of English Language Teaching, 9(1), 109-119. https://doi.org/10.30998/90q4wv14