EXPLORING JUNIOR HIGH SCHOOL STUDENTS’ TRUST AND DEPENDENCY TOWARD CHATGPT IN LEARNING ENGLISH

Damai Nugroho; Seful Bahri

doi:10.30998/ctefe855

Authors

Muhammad Kusuma Damai Nugroho State University of Semarang Author
Dr. Seful Bahri, S.Pd., M.Pd. Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.30998/ctefe855

Keywords:

ChatGPT, EFL learning, student trust, learning dependency, artificial intelligence in education

Abstract

This study explores junior high school students’ trust and dependency toward ChatGPT in learning English within an Indonesian EFL context. Using a qualitative design, three students who frequently used ChatGPT were selected through purposive sampling. Data were collected through semi-structured interviews and analyzed using thematic analysis. The findings reveal that students develop conditional trust, recognizing both the usefulness and limitations of ChatGPT. Dependency varies from supportive use to strong reliance, with some students showing reduced confidence without AI assistance. While ChatGPT improves learning efficiency and accessibility, excessive reliance may reduce students’ cognitive engagement and independent problem-solving. The study highlights the importance of guided and critical use of AI tools to support learner autonomy while preventing overdependence.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Afkarin, M. Y., & Asmara, C. H. (2024). Investigating the implementation of ChatGPT in English language education. Journey: Journal of English Language and Pedagogy, 7(1), 57-66. https://doi.org/10.33503/journey.v7i1.4000

Anwar, K., Ubaidillah, M. F., & Sulistiyo, U. (2020). Exploring EFL teachers’ classroom management: The case of Indonesian secondary schools. Journal of Language and Education, 6(3), 22-35. http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3862391

Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77-101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa

Creswell, J. W., & Poth, C. N. (2018). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches (4th ed.). SAGE Publications.

Dizon, G., Gold, J., & Barnes, R. (2025). ChatGPT for self-regulated language learning: University EFL students’ practices and perceptions. Digital Applied Linguistics, 3. https://doi.org/10.29140/dal.v3.102510

Fitria, T. N. (2023). Artificial intelligence in EFL learning: Opportunities and challenges in Indonesian context. Journal of English Language Teaching and Applied Linguistics, 12(1), 44-58. https://doi.org/10.15294/elt.v12i1.64069

Gefen, D., Karahanna, E., & Straub, D. W. (2003). Trust and TAM in online shopping: An integrated model. MIS Quarterly, 27(1), 51–90. https://doi.org/10.2307/30036519

Ho, P. X. P. (2024). Using ChatGPT in English language learning: A study on I.T. students’ attitudes, habits, and perceptions. International Journal of TESOL & Education, 4(1), 55-68. https://doi.org/10.54855/ijte.24414

Holmes, W., Bialik, M., & Fadel, C. (2019). Artificial intelligence in education: Promises and implications for teaching and learning. Center for Curriculum Redesign.

Imran, M., & Almusharraf, N. (2023). Analyzing the role of ChatGPT as a writing assistant: A systematic review. Contemporary Educational Technology, 15(4), Article ep464. https://doi.org/10.30935/cedtech/13605

Kasneci, E., Sessler, K., Küchemann, S., et al. (2023). ChatGPT for good? On opportunities and challenges of large language models for education. Learning and Individual Differences, 103, 102274. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2023.102274

Kvale, S., & Brinkmann, S. (2009). InterViews: Learning the craft of qualitative research interviewing (2nd ed.). SAGE Publications.

Liu, B. (2023). Chinese university students’ attitudes and perceptions in learning English using ChatGPT. International Journal of Education and Humanities, 3(2), 132-140. https://doi.org/10.58557/(ijeh).v3i2.145

Little, D. (1991). Learner autonomy: Definitions, issues and problems. Dublin: Authentik.

Luckin, R., Holmes, W., Griffiths, M., & Forcier, L. (2016). Intelligence unleashed: An argument for AI in education. Pearson.

Meluwu, D. F. E., & Neman, M. I. E. (2025). Students’ perception towards the use of ChatGPT as a tool for learning English. Global Education Journal, 3(2), 206-216. https://doi.org/10.59525/gej.v3i2.712

Patton, M. Q. (2015). Qualitative research & evaluation methods (4th ed.). SAGE Publications.

Putri, Y. P., Handayani, F., & Permata, R. (2025). ChatGPT in learning English, is it possible? ELP (Journal of English Language Pedagogy), 10(1), 86-95. https://doi.org/10.36665/elp.v10i1.1010

Rahimi, S., & Shute, V. J. (2021). The relationship between learners’ trust in AI tutors and self-regulated learning outcomes. Computers & Education, 168, 104212. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2021.104212

Rahman, M. S., Sabbir, M., Zhang, J., et al. (2023). Examining students’ intention to use ChatGPT: Does trust matter? Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 39(6), 51-71. https://doi.org/10.14742/ajet.8956

Sister, E., Dakhi, K. S., Suseno, M., et al. (2025). Understanding EFL students’ dependency on ChatGPT in English language learning. Ndrumi: Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan dan Humaniora, 8(1), 1-13. https://doi.org/10.57094/ndrumi.v8i1.2872

Wang, J., Qing, S., Yunus, M., & Rafiq, K. R. M. (2023). Integrating ChatGPT into English language teaching and learning: Strengths and weaknesses. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 13(12), 4055-4068. http://dx.doi.org/10.6007/IJARBSS/v13-i12/20251

Zawacki-Richter, O., Marín, V. I., Bond, M., & Gouverneur, F. (2019). Systematic review of research on artificial intelligence applications in higher education. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 16(39). https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-019-0171-0

Zhai, X. (2023). ChatGPT and AI: The game changer for education. Social Science Research Network. https://ssrn.com/abstract=4389098