EXPLORING ENGLISH TEACHERS' PERCEPTIONS ON TEACHING STRATEGIES AND TEACHING PRACTICES IN DEVELOPING STUDENTS' COMMUNICATIVE COMPETENCE

Authors

  • Sa'adatul Fitriani Indraprasta Pgri University image/svg+xml Author
  • Sumaryoto Sumaryoto Author
  • Gustaman Saragih Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.30998/feq07r46

Keywords:

teacher perceptions, teaching strategies, teaching practices

Abstract

The purpose of this research is to explore English teachers’ perceptions of teaching strategies and instructional practices in developing students’ communicative competence. The research employed a descriptive qualitative approach. Data were obtained through semi-structured interviews and classroom observations involving seven English teachers from two public junior high schools in Mauk District, Tangerang Regency. The data were analyzed thematically using method triangulation to ensure validity. The results revealed that 71.43% of teachers perceived communicative competence as the ability to use English in real-life contexts. Meanwhile, 14.29% held a balanced view between communicative and grammatical aspects, and another 14.29% still emphasized grammatical accuracy. However, among the 13 observed teaching practices, only 38.46% involved group discussions or pair work, 30.77% used role-play or real-life simulations, 15.38% applied storytelling or presentations, and 15.38% still implemented grammar-based approaches. These findings indicate a gap between teachers' perceptions and their actual classroom practices. Although the teachers demonstrated a strong understanding of the importance of communicative approaches, their implementation remains limited due to structural and pedagogical constraints. It can be concluded that while most teachers show positive perceptions toward communicative teaching strategies, their classroom application is not yet optimal.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Borg, S. (2003). Teacher cognition in language teaching: A review of research on what language teachers think, know, believe, and do. Language Teaching, 36(2), 81–109. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0261444803001903

Canale, M., & Swain, M. (1980). Theoretical bases of communicative approaches to second language teaching and testing. Applied Linguistics, 1(1), 1-47. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/I.1.1

Creswell, J. W. (2012). Educational research: Planning, conducting, and evaluating quantitative and qualitative research (4th ed.). London: Pearson.

Ellis, R. (2003). Task-based language learning and teaching. Oxford University Press.

Farrell, T. S. C. (2012). Reflecting on reflective practice: (Re)visiting Dewey and Schön. TESOL Journal, 3(1), 7–16. https://doi.org/10.1002/tesj.10

Fajrina, D. (2022). Writing strategies, English proficiency and rhetorical patterns influences on the written outputs of Indonesian students with English as foreign language.

Hymes, D. (1972). Models of the interaction of language and social life. In Gumperz, J. J. & Hymes, D. (Eds.), Directions in Sociolinguistics: The ethnography of communication (pp. 35-71). New York: Holts Rinehart & Winston

Kirkpatrick, A. (2017). World Englishes: Implications for international communication and English language teaching (2nd ed.). Cambridge University Press.

Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., & Saldaña, J. (2014). Qualitative data analysis: A methods sourcebook (3rd ed.). Sage.

Richards, J. C. (2006). Communicative language teaching today. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Richards, J. C., & Rodgers, T. S. (2014). Approaches and methods in language teaching (3rd ed.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Richards, J. C., & Lockhart, C. (1994). Reflective teaching in second language classrooms. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Sugiyono. (2022). Metode penelitian kuantitatif, kualitatif, dan R&D. Alfabeta.

Downloads

Published

2025-08-20

How to Cite

EXPLORING ENGLISH TEACHERS’ PERCEPTIONS ON TEACHING STRATEGIES AND TEACHING PRACTICES IN DEVELOPING STUDENTS’ COMMUNICATIVE COMPETENCE. (2025). INFERENCE: Journal of English Language Teaching, 8(2), 129-137. https://doi.org/10.30998/feq07r46