Interpreting interior heritage at Wisma Batari Surakarta through papanek’s framework

Authors

  • R. Ersnathan B. Prasetyo Institut Seni Indonesia Surakarta image/svg+xml Author
  • Primastiti Wening Mumpuni Institut Seni Indonesia Surakarta image/svg+xml Author
  • Joko Budiwiyanto Institut Seni Indonesia Surakarta image/svg+xml Author
  • Tunjung Bayu Aji Institut Seni Indonesia Surakarta image/svg+xml Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.30998/jd.v13i2.1006

Keywords:

Interior Design, Social Design, Interior Heritage, Victor Papanek, Adaptive Reuse

Abstract

This study analyzes the interior of Wisma Batari in Surakarta as a social design product by applying Victor Papanek’s function complex framework. Interior is not merely an architectural space, but a design artefact that embeds functions, needs, social contexts, symbols, and aesthetic values. The study employs a qualitative descriptive-interpretative method using visual observation and spatial analysis, complemented by thematic reading based on Papanek’s six dimensions: method, use, need, telesis, association, and aesthetics. The findings suggest that the interior of Wisma Batari forms a design system rooted in spatial efficiency, local materials as a reflection of “truth to materials,” and room configurations that support communal activity. Space is never practical alone; it also represents morality, harmony, and unity within Javanese cultural logic. The study highlights that interior heritage can be understood as a social design product that evolves through adaptive reuse and the interrelation of functions, meanings, and materiality. The implication of this research opens a critical approach toward interior heritage as a locus for ethics and social responsibility within contemporary design practices.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Appadurai, A. (1988). The Social Life of Things: Commodities In Cultural Perspective. Cambridge University Press.

Ballesteros-Mejía, M., & Madero, M. A. (2024). 'Mapping Visual-Based Methods: An Interdisciplinary Approach.' Journal of Visual Literacy, 43(4), 285–307. https://doi.org/10.1080/1051144X.2024.2420304

Bhandari, N. B. (2022). 'Homi K. Bhabha’s Third Space Theory and Cultural Identity Today: A Critical Review.' Prithvi Academic Journal, 171–181. https://doi.org/10.3126/paj.v5i1.45049

Böhme, G., & Thibaud, J.-P. (2016). The Aesthetics of Atmospheres. Routledge.

Cohen, M. I. (2019). 'Three Eras of Indonesian Arts Diplomacy.' Bijdragen Tot de Taal-, Land- En Volkenkunde / Journal of the Humanities and Social Sciences of Southeast Asia, 175(2–3), 253–283. https://doi.org/10.1163/22134379-17502022

Edensor, T. (2015). Light Design and Atmosphere. Visual Communication, 14(3), 331–350. https://doi.org/10.1177/1470357215579975

Hepworth, K. (2019). History, Power and Visual Communication Artefacts. In History in the World (pp. 138–160). Routledge.

Jonatan, L. L. (2022). 'Kajian Konsep Adaptive Reuse pada Desain Interior Galeri di Rumah Heritage Istana Batik Keris, Solo'. SENADA (Seminar Nasional Manajemen, Desain Dan Aplikasi Bisnis Teknologi), 5, 331–341.

Kress, G., & Leeuwen, T. V. (2001). Multimodal Discourse. Bloomsbury Academic.

Lee, K. (2022). ‘The Interior Experience of Architecture: An Emotional Connection between Space and The Body. ’ Buildings, 12(3), 326. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings12030326

Lefebvre, H. (2014). ‘The Production of Space (1991). In The People, Place, and Space Reader (pp. 289–293). Routledge.

Manzini, E. (2024). ‘A Double Shift: Design For A New Kind of Social Innovation. ’ Special Supplement: III ESDA DESIS Social Design Days, 11-12 March 2024, Zaragoza, Spain, 87, 87.

Nasar, J. L., & Bokharaei, S. (2017). ‘Lighting Modes and Their Effects on Impressions of Public Squares. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 49, 96–105. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2016.12.007

Naufaly, L., & Subekti, B. (2024). ‘Kontektualitas Desain Fasad Gedung MCHCC RS Hasan Sadikin pada Kawasan Cagar Budaya. ’ JAUR (Journal of Architecture and Urbanism Research), 7(2), 108–118. https://doi.org/10.31289/jaur.v7i2.11663

Oliver, P. (2012). ‘Ethics and Vernacular Architecture. ’ In Ethics and The Built Environment (pp. 115–126). Routledge.

Papanek, V. (1972). Design for the real world. New York: Pantheon Books.

Prown, J. (2012). ‘Mind In Matter: An Introduction To Material Culture Theory and Method. ’ In Interpreting Objects And Collections (pp. 133–138). Routledge.

Rapoport, A. (2016). Housing, Culture, and Design: A Comparative Perspective. University of Pennsylvania Press.

Razak, R. D. F. (2025). ‘Karakteristik dan Pola Penataan Ruang dalam Rumah Toko di Kawasan Pecinan Makassar. ’ Jurnal Desain, 12(2), 390. https://doi.org/10.30998/jd.v12i2.26349

Spanu, S. (2020). ‘Heritage as a Heterotopic Space. The Tertiary Character and the Hybrid Characteristic as Arguments of Its Heterotopic Character. ’ In S. Spanu, Heterotopia and Heritage Preservation (pp. 387–419). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-18259-5_5

Talamini, G., Liu, T., El-Khoury, R., & Shao, D. (2023). ‘ Visibility and Symbolism of Corporate Architecture: A Multi-Method Approach For Visual Impact Assessment. ’ Environment and Planning B: Urban Analytics and City Science, 50(9), 2407–2429. https://doi.org/10.1177/23998083231154587

Trihanondo, D. (2024). ‘Pendekatan Adaptive Reuse pada Ruang dan Fasad Bangunan Modernisme 1960an: Antara Preservasi dan Komersialisasi. ’ Ideas: Jurnal Pendidikan, Sosial, Dan Budaya, 10(3), 501. https://doi.org/10.32884/ideas.v10i3.1806

Yamu, C., Van Nes, A., & Garau, C. (2021). ‘Bill Hillier’s Legacy: Space Syntax—A Synopsis of Basic Concepts, Measures, and Empirical Application. ’ Sustainability, 13(6), 3394. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13063394

Zeisel, J. (1984). Inquiry by Design: Tools for Environment-Behaviour Research (Issue 5). CUP archive.

Downloads

Published

01/22/2026

How to Cite

Prasetyo, R. E. B., Mumpuni, P. W., Budiwiyanto, J., & Aji, T. B. (2026). Interpreting interior heritage at Wisma Batari Surakarta through papanek’s framework. Jurnal Desain, 13(2), 437-449. https://doi.org/10.30998/jd.v13i2.1006