Restorasi phronesis dan martabat seni-desain melalui kerangka Prote Philosophia aristotelian
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.30998/jd.v13i3.1382Keywords:
Prote Philosophia, phronesis, ontologi seni-desain, etika desain, ekonomi atensiAbstract
Penelitian ini bertujuan merekonstruksi bangunan pengetahuan seni-desain yang mengalami distorsi ontologis akibat dominasi ekonomi atensi dan integrasi AI generatif. Dengan menggunakan pendekatan hermeneutika filosofis atas teks Metaphysics dan Nicomachean Ethics karya Aristotle, naskah ini memformulasikan kembali relasi antara theoretike, poietike, dan praktike di bawah pengarah phronesis. Analisis dilakukan terhadap artefak digital kontemporer, khususnya fitur infinite scroll dan consent banner, untuk menunjukkan bagaimana efektivitas teknis (techne) sering kali mengorbankan horizon etis (praktike). Hasil kajian menunjukkan bahwa infinite scroll bekerja sebagai mekanisme pembentukan habitus temporal yang mengikis otonomi subjek, sementara consent banner beroperasi melalui asimetri pilihan visual yang memanipulasi keputusan pengguna. Melalui matriks Prote Philosophia, penelitian ini menawarkan kerangka kerja operasional yang memposisikan eudaimonia sebagai telos utama praktik kreatif untuk memulihkan martabat desainer. Simpulan menegaskan bahwa pemulihan martabat seni-desain mensyaratkan reposisi desainer dari sekadar operator sistem menjadi subjek reflektif yang mampu menimbang konsekuensi sosial-budaya artefak secara kontekstual melalui pengaktifan kebijaksanaan praktis.
Downloads
References
Aristotle. (2009). The Nicomachean ethics (D. Ross, Trans.; L. Brown, Ed.). Oxford University Press. (Original work published ca. 340 B.C.E.).
Aristotle. (2016). Metaphysics (C. D. C. Reeve, Trans.). Hackett Publishing.
Bekker, T., Skovbjerg, H. M., Petersen, M. L., & Johry, A. (2025). Theory as design material: How design researchers use design skills to explore the malleability of theory. International Journal of Design, 19(2), 1-12. https://doi.org/10.57698/v19i2.01
Bhargava, V. R., & Velasquez, M. (2021). Ethics of the attention economy: The problem of social media addiction. Business Ethics Quarterly, 31(3), 321-359. https://doi.org/10.1017/beq.2020.32
Brenncke, M. (2024). A theory of exploitation for consumer law: Online choice architectures, dark patterns, and autonomy violations. Journal of Consumer Policy, 47, 127-164. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10603-023-09554-7
Collins, R., Redström, J., & Rozendaal, M. (2024). The right to contestation: Towards repairing our interactions with algorithmic decision systems. International Journal of Design, 18(1), 95-106. https://doi.org/10.57698/v18i1.06
Cross, N. (2006). Designerly ways of knowing. Springer.
Dindler, C., Krogh, P. G., Tikær, K., & Nørregård, P. S. (2022). Engagements and articulations of ethics in design practice. International Journal of Design, 16(2), 47-56. https://doi.org/10.57698/v16i2.04
Donia, J., & Shaw, J. A. (2021). Ethics and values in design: A structured review and theoretical critique. Science and Engineering Ethics, 27(5), 57. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-021-00329-2
Erickson, K. (2024). AI and work in the creative industries: Digital continuity or discontinuity? Creative Industries Journal, 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1080/17510694.2024.2421135
Floridi, L. (2019). What the near future of artificial intelligence could be. Philosophy & Technology, 32(1), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13347-019-00345-y
Floridi, L. (2020). The green and the blue: A new political ontology for a mature information society (SSRN Working Paper No. 3831094). Social Science Research Network. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3831094
Floridi, L., Cowls, J., King, T. C., & Taddeo, M. (2020). How to design AI for social good: Seven essential factors. Science and Engineering Ethics, 26(3), 1771–1796. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-020-00213-5
Ghassan, A. (2022). Designerly ways of speaking: Unpacking the discourse of Design Thinking. The Design Journal, 25(4), 596-616. https://doi.org/10.1080/14606925.2022.2058450
Ho, J. C. F. (2024). Communicating the use of generative AI to design students: Fostering ethics rather than teaching it. In C. Gray, E. Ciliotta Chehade, P. Hekkert, L. Forlano, P. Ciuccarelli, & P. Lloyd (Eds.), DRS2024: Boston, 23-28 June, Boston, USA. Design Research Society. https://doi.org/10.21606/drs.2024.731
Ho, J. C. F. (2024). Communicating the use of generative AI to design students: Fostering ethics rather than teaching it. In C. Gray, E. Ciliotta Chehade, P. Hekkert, L. Forlano, P. Ciuccarelli, & P. Lloyd (Eds.), DRS2024: Boston, 23–28 June 2024. Design Research Society. https://doi.org/10.21606/drs.2024.731
Kelly, V., & Kelly, M. (2024). With great power comes great responsibility: The discourse of conduct and ethics in professional design. In C. Gray, E. Ciliotta Chehade, P. Hekkert, L. Forlano, P. Ciuccarelli, & P. Lloyd (Eds.), DRS2024: Boston, 23-28 June, Boston, USA. Design Research Society. https://doi.org/10.21606/drs.2024.416
Kollmer, T., & Eckhardt, A. (2023). Dark patterns. Business & Information Systems Engineering, 65, 201-208. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12599-022-00783-7
Mapes, B., & Park Lee, J. (2024). AI in human-centered design: Ethical considerations. In C. Gray, P. Hekkert, L. Forlano, & P. Ciuccarelli (Eds.), DRS2024: Boston, 23-28 June, Boston, USA. Design Research Society. https://doi.org/10.21606/drs.2024.1660
Mapes, B., & Park Lee, J. (2024). AI in human-centered design: Ethical considerations. In C. Gray, E. Ciliotta Chehade, P. Hekkert, L. Forlano, P. Ciuccarelli, & P. Lloyd (Eds.), DRS2024: Boston, 23–28 June 2024. Design Research Society. https://doi.org/10.21606/drs.2024.527
Mazzi, F., & Floridi, L. (2023). Introduction: Understanding the ethics of artificial intelligence for the Sustainable Development Goals. In F. Mazzi & L. Floridi (Eds.), The ethics of artificial intelligence for the Sustainable Development Goals (pp. 3–7). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-40978-7_1
Monge Roffarello, A., & De Russis, L. (2023). Achieving digital wellbeing through digital self-control tools: A systematic review and meta-analysis. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction, 30(4), 1-66. https://doi.org/10.1145/3571810
Monge Roffarello, A., De Russis, L., & Lukoff, K. (2025). The digital attention heuristics: Supporting the user's attention by design. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction, 32(4), 1-41. https://doi.org/10.1145/3725215
Monge Roffarello, A., Lukoff, K., & De Russis, L. (2023). Defining and identifying attention-capture deceptive designs in digital interfaces. In Proceedings of the 2023 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 1-19). ACM. https://doi.org/10.1145/3544548.3580729
Nelissen, L. G. M., & Funk, M. (2022). Rationalizing dark patterns: Examining the process of designing privacy UX through speculative enactments. International Journal of Design, 16(1), 75-92. https://doi.org/10.57698/v16i1.05
Rosén, A. P., Normark, M., & Wiberg, M. (2022). Towards more-than-human-centred design: Learning from gardening. International Journal of Design, 16(3), 21-36. https://doi.org/10.57698/v16i3.02
Saha, T., & Nusem, E. (2024). Ecologies otherwise: Mapping ontological, speculative, and transition design discourses. Design and Culture, 16(2), 191-210. https://doi.org/10.1080/17547075.2024.2335429
Schön, D. A. (1983). The reflective practitioner: How professionals think in action. Basic Books.
Trzaskowski, J. (2024). Manipulation by design. Electronic Markets, 34, Article 14. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12525-024-00699-y
Verbeek, P.-P. (2011). Moralizing technology: Understanding and designing the morality of things (2nd ed.). The University of Chicago Press.
Vesti, H. N., Laursen, L. N., & Tollestrup, C. (2024). Past, present and future of design ethics. In DRS2024: Research papers. Design Research Society. https://doi.org/10.21606/drs.2024.844
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Bambang Sunarto (Author)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
All articles published in Jurnal Desain are made available under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC 4.0), except material expressly excluded from the article's license by a separate credit or rights notice.
1. Permissions Granted
Under CC BY-NC 4.0, users may share (copy and redistribute) and adapt (remix, transform, and build upon) the licensed material in any medium or format, including for teaching, research, and other non-commercial purposes, subject to the license terms.
2. Attribution (BY)
Users must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. Attribution should identify the original author(s), the article, the journal, and, where available, the article DOI. Attribution must not imply endorsement by the author(s) or journal.
3. NonCommercial (NC)
Licensed content must not be used primarily for commercial advantage or monetary compensation without separate permission from the relevant copyright holder(s). Users uncertain whether their proposed use is commercial should consult the license terms and seek permission where appropriate.
4. Third-Party Content and Other Rights
The license does not automatically cover third-party works or materials expressly excluded from the article's licensing notice. Moral rights, privacy rights, publicity rights, and other applicable rights and restrictions must also be respected.
5. No Additional Restrictions
Users must not impose additional legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from exercising the permissions granted by the license.
6. Official License
For the authoritative legal terms, consult the CC BY-NC 4.0 Legal Code. Copyright ownership is explained separately in the Copyright Notice.
